Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25142591›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2014

Impact of clade, geography, and age of the epidemic on HIV-1 neutralization by antibodies.

Peter Hraber, Bette T Korber, Alan S Lapedes, Robert T Bailer, Michael S Seaman, Hongmei Gao, Kelli M Greene, Francine McCutchan, Carolyn Williamson, Jerome H Kim and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter HraberLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Bette T KorberLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA New Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Alan S LapedesLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Robert T BailerVaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Michael S SeamanBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hongmei GaoDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kelli M GreeneDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Francine McCutchanUS Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Carolyn WilliamsonInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jerome H KimUS Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Sodsai TovanabutraUS Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Beatrice H HahnPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ronald SwanstromDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Michael M ThomsonCentro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Feng GaoDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Linda HarrisFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Elena GiorgiLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Nicholas HengartnerLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Tanmoy BhattacharyaLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
John R MascolaVaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
David C MontefioriDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA david.montefiori@duke.edu.
Los Alamos National Laboratory · USDuke Medical Center · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESNew Mexico Consortium · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledNeutralizing antibodies (nAbs) are a high priority for vaccines that aim to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection. Vaccine effectiveness will depend on the extent to which induced antibodies neutralize the global diversity of circulating HIV-1 variants. Using large panels of genetically and geographically diverse HIV-1 Env-pseudotyped viruses and chronic infection plasma samples, we unambiguously show that cross-clade nAb responses are commonly induced in response to infection by any virus clade. Nonetheless, neutralization was significantly greater when the plasma clade matched the clade of the virus being tested. This within-clade advantage was diminished in older, more-diverse epidemics in southern Africa, the United States, and Europe compared to more recent epidemics in Asia. It was most pronounced for circulating recombinant form (CRF) 07_BC, which is common in China and is the least-divergent lineage studied; this was followed by the slightly more diverse Asian CRF01_AE. We found no evidence that transmitted/founder viruses are generally more susceptible to neutralization and are therefore easier targets for vaccination than chronic viruses. Features of the gp120 V1V2 loop, in particular, length, net charge, and number of N-linked glycans, were associated with Env susceptibility and plasma neutralization potency in a manner consistent with neutralization escape being a force that drives viral diversification and plasma neutralization breadth. The overall susceptibility of Envs and potencies of plasma samples were highly predictive of the neutralization outcome of any single virus-plasma combination. These findings highlight important considerations for the design and testing of candidate HIV-1 vaccines that aim to elicit effective nAbs. IMPORTANCE: An effective HIV-1 vaccine will need to overcome the extraordinary variability of the virus, which is most pronounced in the envelope glycoproteins (Env), which are the sole targets for neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). Distinct genetic lineages, or clades, of HIV-1 occur in different locales that may require special consideration when designing and testing vaccines candidates. We show that nAb responses to HIV-1 infection are generally active across clades but are most potent within clades. Because effective vaccine-induced nAbs are likely to share these properties, optimal coverage of a particular clade or combination of clades may require clade-matched immunogens. Optimal within-clade coverage might be easier to achieve in regions such as China and Thailand, where the epidemic is more recent and the virus less diverse than in southern Africa, the United States, and Europe. Finally, features of the first and second hypervariable regions of gp120 (V1V2) may be critical for optimal vaccine design.

Indexed as

EpidemicsAntibodies, Neutralizingenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusGenotypeGeographyGlobal HealthHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansTime FactorsAntibodies, Neutralizingenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID25142591
PMCPMC4248897
OpenAlexW2126614686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.