ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2014
Progressive promoter element combinations classify conserved orthogonal plant circadian gene expression modules.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rhythms of Transcription in Field-Grown Sugarcane Are Highly Organ Specific.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Extensive Transcriptome Changes During Natural Onset and Release of Vegetative Bud Dormancy in Populus.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to test the proposal that progressive combinations of multiple promoter elements acting in concert may be responsible for the full range of phases observed in plant circadian output genes. In order to allow reliable selection of informative phase groupings of genes for our purpose, intrinsic cyclic patterns of expression were identified using a novel, non-biased method for the identification of circadian genes. Our non-biased approach identified two dominant, inherent orthogonal circadian trends underlying publicly available microarray data from plants maintained under constant conditions. Furthermore, these trends were highly conserved across several plant species. Four phase-specific modules of circadian genes were generated by projection onto these trends and, in order to identify potential combinatorial promoter elements that might classify genes into these groups, we used a Random Forest pipeline which merged data from multiple decision trees to look for the presence of element combinations. We identified a number of regulatory motifs which aggregated into coherent clusters capable of predicting the inclusion of genes within each phase module with very high fidelity and these motif combinations changed in a consistent, progressive manner from one phase module group to the next, providing strong support for our hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.