ArticleJAMA surgery2014
Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Cultural and Social Determinants of Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Aesthetic Flat Closure Following Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Patient Perspectives.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Patient decision aids in breast surgery and breast reconstruction reduce decisional conflict: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Pooled it
- Making decisions about breast reconstruction: A systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017Pooled it
- Complications and thromboembolic events associated with tamoxifen therapy in patients with breast cancer undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2017Pooled it
- Quality of Patient Decisions About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.JAMA surgery · 2017Trial
- Understanding and Optimizing the Patient Experience in Breast Reconstruction.Annals of plastic surgery · 2016Trial
- Decreasing Time to Definitive Breast Reconstruction: National Trends and Patient-Level Predictors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The Architecture of Shared Decision-Making in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Measures, and Clinical Realities.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Technique-Driven and Patient-Specific Variations in Complications of Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Evidence-Based Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Treatment and Information Access.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Factors Driving Low Rates of Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Insights Into 'Living Flat': A Qualitative Study of Patients Who Have Mastectomy Without Reconstruction.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Willingness to Undergo Corrective Surgery After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Chinese Patients with Breast Deformities: A Single-Center Study.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- "Going Flat" in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy-An Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements of Preliminary 57 Procedures.The breast journal · 2026Article
- Annals of Surgical Oncology Landmark Series Disparities in Surgical Oncology: Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Women's satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy and a survey on the decision process for type of reconstructive surgery.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
- Barriers to Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Objective and Subjective Factors Influencing Breast Reconstruction Decision-Making After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Reconceptualizing Patient-reported Outcomes Measures in the Australian Breast Device Registry.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceMost women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer do not undergo breast reconstruction.
objectiveTo examine correlates of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and to determine if a significant unmet need for reconstruction exists. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsWe used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries from Los Angeles, California, and Detroit, Michigan, for rapid case ascertainment to identify a sample of women aged 20 to 79 years diagnosed as having ductal carcinoma in situ or stages I to III invasive breast cancer. Black and Latina women were oversampled to ensure adequate representation of racial/ethnic minorities. Eligible participants were able to complete a survey in English or Spanish. Of 3252 women sent the initial survey a median of 9 months after diagnosis, 2290 completed it. Those who remained disease free were surveyed 4 years later to determine the frequency of immediate and delayed reconstruction and patient attitudes toward the procedure; 1536 completed the follow-up survey. The 485 who remained disease free at follow-up underwent analysis. EXPOSURES: Disease-free survival of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Breast reconstruction at any time after mastectomy and patient satisfaction with different aspects of the reconstruction decision-making process.
resultsResponse rates in the initial and follow-up surveys were 73.1% and 67.7%, respectively (overall, 49.4%). Of 485 patients reporting mastectomy at the initial survey and remaining disease free, 24.8% underwent immediate and 16.8% underwent delayed reconstruction (total, 41.6%). Factors significantly associated with not undergoing reconstruction were black race (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.16 [95% CI, 1.11-4.20]; P = .004), lower educational level (AOR, 4.49 [95% CI, 2.31-8.72]; P < .001), increased age (AOR in 10-year increments, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.77-3.61]; P < .001), major comorbidity (AOR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.01-5.11]; P = .048), and chemotherapy (AOR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.99-3.31]; P = .05). Only 13.3% of women were dissatisfied with the reconstruction decision-making process, but dissatisfaction was higher among nonwhite patients in the sample (AOR, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.27-6.51]; P = .03). The most common patient-reported reasons for not having reconstruction were the desire to avoid additional surgery (48.5%) and the belief that it was not important (33.8%), but 36.3% expressed fear of implants. Reasons for avoiding reconstruction and systems barriers to care varied by race; barriers were more common among nonwhite participants. Residual demand for reconstruction at 4 years was low, with only 30 of 263 who did not undergo reconstruction still considering the procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Reconstruction rates largely reflect patient demand; most patients are satisfied with the decision-making process about reconstruction. Specific approaches are needed to address lingering patient-level and system factors with a negative effect on reconstruction among minority women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.