Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25141922›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Selective augmentation of striatal functional connectivity following NMDA receptor antagonism: implications for psychosis.

Orwa Dandash, Ben J Harrison, Ram Adapa, Raphael Gaillard, Francesco Giorlando, Stephen J Wood, Paul C Fletcher, Alex Fornito

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Orwa Dandash1] Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia [2] Monash Clinical and Imaging Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Ben J HarrisonMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ram Adapa1] Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK [2] Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Raphael Gaillard1] Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM UMR S894, Paris, France [2] Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Department of Psychiatry, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, Paris, France [3] INSERM, Laboratoire de Physiopathologie des Maladies Psychiatriques, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, UMR S894, Paris, France.
Francesco GiorlandoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stephen J Wood1] Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia [2] School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paul C FletcherDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Mapping Unit and Behavioural and Clinical Neurosciences Institute, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alex Fornito1] Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia [2] Monash Clinical and Imaging Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Cambridge · GBMonash University · AUUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G1000183Wellcome Trust 064351Wellcome Trust 083660/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust 095692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The psychotomimetic effect of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist ketamine is thought to arise from a functional modulation of the brain's fronto-striato-thalamic (FST) circuits. Animal models suggest a pronounced effect on ventral 'limbic' FST systems, although recent work in patients with psychosis and high-risk individuals suggests specific alterations of dorsal 'associative' FST circuits. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the effects of a subanesthetic dose of ketamine on measures of functional connectivity as indexed by the temporal coherence of spontaneous neural activity in both dorsal and ventral FST circuits, as well as their symptom correlates. We adopted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, repeated-measures design in which 19 healthy participants received either an intravenous saline infusion or a racemic mixture of ketamine (100 ng/ml) separated by at least 1 week. Compared with placebo, ketamine increased functional connectivity between the dorsal caudate and both the thalamus and midbrain bilaterally. Ketamine additionally increased functional connectivity of the ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Both connectivity increases significantly correlated with the psychosis-like and dissociative symptoms under ketamine. Importantly, dorsal caudate connectivity with the ventrolateral thalamus and subthalamic nucleus showed inverse correlation with ketamine-induced symptomatology, pointing to a possible resilience role to disturbances in FST circuits. Although consistent with the role of FST in mediating psychosis, these findings contrast with previous research in clinical samples by suggesting that acute NMDAR antagonism may lead to psychosis-like experiences via a mechanism that is distinct from that implicated in frank psychotic illness.

Indexed as

AdultCorpus StriatumDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional NeuroimagingHumansKetamineMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMesencephalonNeural PathwaysNucleus AccumbensPrefrontal CortexPsychoses, Substance-InducedReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateKetamineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID25141922
PMCPMC4246009
OpenAlexW2007087269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.