Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25141888›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2014

Mosquito cell lines: history, isolation, availability and application to assess the threat of arboviral transmission in the United Kingdom.

Thomas Walker, Claire L Jeffries, Karen L Mansfield, Nicholas Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Novel systems to study vector-pathogen interactions in malaria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Understanding Molecular Pathogenesis with Chikungunya Virus Research Tools.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas Walker
Claire L JeffriesAnimal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK. Claire.Jeffries@lshtm.ac.uk.
Karen L Mansfield
Nicholas Johnson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquitoes are highly effective vectors for transmission of human and animal pathogens. Understanding the relationship between pathogen and vector is vital in developing strategies to predict and prevent transmission. Cell lines derived from appropriate mosquito hosts provide a relatively simple tool for investigating the interaction between the host and viruses transmitted by mosquitoes. This review provides a brief overview of the development of mosquito cell lines, methods of isolation, their availability and application for investigating insect-virus interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsArbovirusesArbovirus InfectionsCell LineCulicidaeHumansUnited KingdomVirus Cultivation

Identifiers

PMID25141888
PMCPMC4150944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.