Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25141122›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Simulating the impact of improved cardiovascular risk interventions on clinical and economic outcomes in Russia.

Kenny Shum, Peter Alperin, Svetlana Shalnova, Sergey Boytsov, Anna Kontsevaya, Alexey Vigdorchik, Adam Guetz, Jennifer Eriksson, David Hughes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Clinical Factors on the Achievement of Target Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients from Ivanovo Region of Russia: Data of 2015.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenny ShumArchimedes, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Peter AlperinArchimedes, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Svetlana ShalnovaNational Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey BoytsovNational Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Anna KontsevayaNational Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey VigdorchikNovartis Pharma LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Adam GuetzArchimedes, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jennifer ErikssonOptumInsight Life Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
David HughesDepartment of Healthcare Systems, Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland.
National Research Center for Preventive Medicine · RUNovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRussia faces a high burden of cardiovascular disease. Prevalence of all cardiovascular risk factors, especially hypertension, is high. Elevated blood pressure is generally poorly controlled and medication usage is suboptimal. With a disease-model simulation, we forecast how various treatment programs aimed at increasing blood pressure control would affect cardiovascular outcomes. In addition, we investigated what additional benefit adding lipid control and smoking cessation to blood pressure control would generate in terms of reduced cardiovascular events. Finally, we estimated the direct health care costs saved by treating fewer cardiovascular events.

methodsThe Archimedes Model, a detailed computer model of human physiology, disease progression, and health care delivery was adapted to the Russian setting. Intervention scenarios of achieving systolic blood pressure control rates (defined as systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg) of 40% and 60% were simulated by modifying adherence rates of an antihypertensive medication combination and compared with current care (23.9% blood pressure control rate). Outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events; cerebrovascular event (stroke), myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death over a 10-year time horizon were reported. Direct health care costs of strokes and myocardial infarctions were derived from official Russian statistics and tariff lists.

resultsTo achieve systolic blood pressure control rates of 40% and 60%, adherence rates to the antihypertensive treatment program were 29.4% and 65.9%. Cardiovascular death relative risk reductions were 13.2%, and 29.6%, respectively. For the current estimated 43,855,000-person Russian hypertensive population, each control-rate scenario resulted in an absolute reduction of 1.0 million and 2.4 million cardiovascular deaths, and a reduction of 1.2 million and 2.7 million stroke/myocardial infarction diagnoses, respectively. Averted direct costs from current care levels ($7.6 billion [in United States dollars]) were $1.1 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsMedication AdherenceAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansHypertensionModels, EconomicModels, TheoreticalRisk FactorsRussiaAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25141122
PMCPMC4139197
OpenAlexW1996383628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.