Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25141116›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2014

Neuroprotective effect of epidural hypothermia after spinal cord lesion in rats.

Marcello Oliveira Barbosa, Alexandre Fogaça Cristante, Gustavo Bispo Dos Santos, Ricardo Ferreira, Raphael Martus Marcon, Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcello Oliveira BarbosaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital das Forças Armadas (HFA), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Alexandre Fogaça CristanteInstituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IOT-HCFMUSP), Spine Division, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gustavo Bispo Dos SantosInstituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IOT-HCFMUSP), Biologist Laboratory of Medical Investigation - 41, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo FerreiraInstituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IOT-HCFMUSP), Spine Division, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Raphael Martus MarconInstituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IOT-HCFMUSP), Spine Division, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de Barros FilhoInstituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IOT-HCFMUSP), Spine Division, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital Central de las Fuerzas Armadas · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the neuroprotective effect of epidural hypothermia in rats subjected to experimental spinal cord lesion.

methodsWistar rats (n = 30) weighing 320-360 g were randomized to two groups (hypothermia and control) of 15 rats per group. A spinal cord lesion was induced by the standardized drop of a 10-g weight from a height of 2.5 cm, using the New York University Impactor, after laminectomy at the T9-10 level. Rats in the hypothermia group underwent epidural hypothermia for 20 minutes immediately after spinal cord injury. Motor function was assessed for six weeks using the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan motor scores and the inclined plane test. At the end of the final week, the rats' neurological status was monitored by the motor evoked potential test and the results for the two groups were compared.

resultsAnalysis of the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan scores obtained during the six-week period indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the inclined plane test scores during the six-week period. Furthermore, at the end of the study, the latency and amplitude values of the motor evoked potential test were not significantly different between the two groups.

conclusionHypothermia did not produce a neuroprotective effect when applied at the injury level and in the epidural space immediately after induction of a spinal cord contusion in Wistar rats.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEpidural SpaceEvoked Potentials, MotorExtremitiesFemaleHumansHypothermia, InducedMaleMotor SkillsRandom AllocationRats, WistarRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25141116
PMCPMC4129554
OpenAlexW2014791288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.