Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25140675›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Transcriptomic analysis of tail regeneration in the lizard Anolis carolinensis reveals activation of conserved vertebrate developmental and repair mechanisms.

Elizabeth D Hutchins, Glenn J Markov, Walter L Eckalbar, Rajani M George, Jesse M King, Minami A Tokuyama, Lauren A Geiger, Nataliya Emmert, Michael J Ammar, April N Allen and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Macrophages orchestrate tail regeneration in lizardsFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Hazards of Regeneration: From Morgan's Legacy to Evo-Devo.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Diverse Manifestations of Regeneration and Why We Need to Study Them.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth D HutchinsSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Glenn J MarkovSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Walter L EckalbarSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Rajani M GeorgeSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Jesse M KingSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Minami A TokuyamaSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Lauren A GeigerSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Nataliya EmmertSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Michael J AmmarSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
April N AllenNeurogenomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Ashley L SiniardNeurogenomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Jason J CorneveauxNeurogenomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Rebecca E FisherSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America; Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Juli WadeDepartments of Psychology and Zoology, Program in Neuroscience, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Dale F DeNardoSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
J Alan RawlsSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Matthew J HuentelmanNeurogenomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Jeanne Wilson-RawlsSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Kenro KusumiSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America; Neurogenomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America; Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Arizona State University · USTranslational Genomics Research Institute · USMichigan United · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Developing the Anolis Lizard as a Model of Musculoskeletal RegenerationR21RR031305 · NCRR · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUSUMI, KENRO · 2010 to 2011
$413k
Connecting the proteome and transcriptome during regenerationR21AR064935 · NIAMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUSUMI, KENRO · 2013 to 2014
$345k
NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR031305NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR064935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lizards, which are amniote vertebrates like humans, are able to lose and regenerate a functional tail. Understanding the molecular basis of this process would advance regenerative approaches in amniotes, including humans. We have carried out the first transcriptomic analysis of tail regeneration in a lizard, the green anole Anolis carolinensis, which revealed 326 differentially expressed genes activating multiple developmental and repair mechanisms. Specifically, genes involved in wound response, hormonal regulation, musculoskeletal development, and the Wnt and MAPK/FGF pathways were differentially expressed along the regenerating tail axis. Furthermore, we identified 2 microRNA precursor families, 22 unclassified non-coding RNAs, and 3 novel protein-coding genes significantly enriched in the regenerating tail. However, high levels of progenitor/stem cell markers were not observed in any region of the regenerating tail. Furthermore, we observed multiple tissue-type specific clusters of proliferating cells along the regenerating tail, not localized to the tail tip. These findings predict a different mechanism of regeneration in the lizard than the blastema model described in the salamander and the zebrafish, which are anamniote vertebrates. Thus, lizard tail regrowth involves the activation of conserved developmental and wound response pathways, which are potential targets for regenerative medical therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsLizardsRegenerationTailTranscriptomeWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID25140675
PMCPMC4139331
OpenAlexW2030961917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.