ArticlePloS one2014
An efficient approach for differentiating Alzheimer's disease from normal elderly based on multicenter MRI using gray-level invariant features.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Single-Modal to Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Databases, Modalities, Diagnostic Performance, and Clinical Translation Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Neuroimage analysis using artificial intelligence approaches: a systematic review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Pooled it
- Structural magnetic resonance imaging for the early diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in people with mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Advancing Alzheimer's research: A review of big data promises.International journal of medical informatics · 2017Pooled it
- Mild Cognitive Impairment: Data-Driven Prediction, Risk Factors, and Workup.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023Article
- Neurodegenerative diseases-Caps: a capsule network based early screening system for the classification of neurodegenerative diseases.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging texture predicts progression to dementia due to Alzheimer disease earlier than hippocampal volumeJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2020Article
- Deep Learning Prediction of Mild Cognitive Impairment using Electronic Health Records.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2019Article
- Machine learning studies on major brain diseases: 5-year trends of 2014-2018.Japanese journal of radiology · 2019Review
- Recent publications from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Reviewing progress toward improved AD clinical trials.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2017Review
- Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls.NeuroImage · 2017Review
- Multi-center MRI prediction models: Predicting sex and illness course in first episode psychosis patients.NeuroImage · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning techniques, along with imaging markers extracted from structural magnetic resonance images, have been shown to increase the accuracy to differentiate patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) from normal elderly controls. Several forms of anatomical features, such as cortical volume, shape, and thickness, have demonstrated discriminative capability. These approaches rely on accurate non-linear image transformation, which could invite several nuisance factors, such as dependency on transformation parameters and the degree of anatomical abnormality, and an unpredictable influence of residual registration errors. In this study, we tested a simple method to extract disease-related anatomical features, which is suitable for initial stratification of the heterogeneous patient populations often encountered in clinical data. The method employed gray-level invariant features, which were extracted from linearly transformed images, to characterize AD-specific anatomical features. The intensity information from a disease-specific spatial masking, which was linearly registered to each patient, was used to capture the anatomical features. We implemented a two-step feature selection for anatomic recognition. First, a statistic-based feature selection was implemented to extract AD-related anatomical features while excluding non-significant features. Then, seven knowledge-based ROIs were used to capture the local discriminative powers of selected voxels within areas that were sensitive to AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The discriminative capability of the proposed feature was measured by its performance in differentiating AD or MCI from normal elderly controls (NC) using a support vector machine. The statistic-based feature selection, together with the knowledge-based masks, provided a promising solution for capturing anatomical features of the brain efficiently. For the analysis of clinical populations, which are inherently heterogeneous, this approach could stratify the large amount of data rapidly and could be combined with more detailed subsequent analyses based on non-linear transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.