Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25140324›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2014

Role of CT perfusion in monitoring and prediction of response to therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Lorenzo Preda, Sonia Francesca Calloni, Marco Elvio Manlio Moscatelli, Maria Cossu Rocca, Massimo Bellomi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorenzo PredaDivision of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Sonia Francesca CalloniDivision of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy ; University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6899-422X
Marco Elvio Manlio MoscatelliDivision of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy ; University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Maria Cossu RoccaDivision of Medical Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Massimo BellomiDivision of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy ; University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7798-1175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to summarize the technique and clinical applications of CT perfusion (CTp) of head and neck cancer. The most common pathologic type (90%) of head and neck cancer is squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): its diagnostic workup relies on CT and MRI, as they provide an accurate staging for the disease by determining tumour volume, assessing its extension, and detecting of lymph node metastases. Compared with conventional CT and MRI, CTp allows for obtaining measures of tumour vascular physiology and functional behaviour, and it has been demonstrated to be a feasible and useful tool in predicting local outcomes in patients undergoing radiation therapy and chemotherapy and may help monitor both treatments.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyNeovascularization, PathologicPerfusion ImagingTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25140324
PMCPMC4129140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.