Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25140241›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2014

Use of Martius flap in the complex female urethral surgery.

George Kasyan, Nataliya Tupikina, Dmitry Pushkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

George KasyanUrology Department of Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.
Nataliya TupikinaUrology Department of Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry PushkarUrology Department of Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObjectives were to evaluate safety and patient reported perception of the Martius fibroadipose flap for complex female urethra reconstruction. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients operated with a Martius flap were contacted again via telephone to rate their self-perception on cosmetic appearance, pain or numbness of the flap harvest site.

results37 women (mean age of 46.8 yrs.) were operated with Martius flaps. Complications were limited to bleeding from the flap bed in 19% (7/37); hematomas - 5.4% (2/37); and lymphorrhea from the labial incision in 13.5% (5/37) and labial wound infection in 5.4% of cases (2/37). For self-perception 65% of patients (24/37) were phone interviewed (mean follow up - 54.2 months). Only 17% of women (4/24) complained to cosmetic problems. Two patients (8%) complained to a periodical mild pain. And 12.5% (3/24) of the women had decreased sensation or numbness at the labia.

conclusionsMartius flap is safe and it is not causing significant complications during female urethral reconstruction. However, an informed consent for decreased sensation and numbness at the flap harvesting area should be obtained.

Indexed as

female urethraradiationself–perceptionsurgical flapsurinary fistula

Identifiers

PMID25140241
PMCPMC4132599
OpenAlexW2096161372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.