Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25140129›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2014

Changes in complex spike activity during classical conditioning.

Anders Rasmussen, Dan-Anders Jirenhed, Daniel Z Wetmore, Germund Hesslow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anders RasmussenDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Associative Learning Group, Lund University Lund, Sweden ; Linneaus Center CCL, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Dan-Anders JirenhedDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Associative Learning Group, Lund University Lund, Sweden ; Linneaus Center CCL, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Daniel Z WetmoreDepartment of Physics, James H. Clark Center for Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA.
Germund HesslowDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Associative Learning Group, Lund University Lund, Sweden ; Linneaus Center CCL, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellar cortex is necessary for adaptively timed conditioned responses (CRs) in eyeblink conditioning. During conditioning, Purkinje cells acquire pause responses or "Purkinje cell CRs" to the conditioned stimuli (CS), resulting in disinhibition of the cerebellar nuclei (CN), allowing them to activate motor nuclei that control eyeblinks. This disinhibition also causes inhibition of the inferior olive (IO), via the nucleo-olivary pathway (N-O). Activation of the IO, which relays the unconditional stimulus (US) to the cortex, elicits characteristic complex spikes in Purkinje cells. Although Purkinje cell activity, as well as stimulation of the CN, is known to influence IO activity, much remains to be learned about the way that learned changes in simple spike firing affects the IO. In the present study, we analyzed changes in simple and complex spike firing, in extracellular Purkinje cell records, from the C3 zone, in decerebrate ferrets undergoing training in a conditioning paradigm. In agreement with the N-O feedback hypothesis, acquisition resulted in a gradual decrease in complex spike activity during the conditioned stimulus, with a delay that is consistent with the long N-O latency. Also supporting the feedback hypothesis, training with a short interstimulus interval (ISI), which does not lead to acquisition of a Purkinje cell CR, did not cause a suppression of complex spike activity. In contrast, observations that extinction did not lead to a recovery in complex spike activity and the irregular patterns of simple and complex spike activity after the conditioned stimulus are less conclusive.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCerebellar CortexConditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalFerretsMaleNeural PathwaysPurkinje CellsTime Factorscomplex spikeseyeblink conditioninginferior oliveinterstimulus intervalin vivo electrophysiologynucleo-olivary pathwayoscillationspurkinje cells

Identifiers

PMID25140129
PMCPMC4122208
OpenAlexW2086227359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.