Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25140125›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2014

Sexual attractiveness of male chemicals and vocalizations in mice.

Akari Asaba, Tatsuya Hattori, Kazutaka Mogi, Takefumi Kikusui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neural control of female sexual behaviors.Hormones and behavior · 2023
    Review
  15. Prosocial Effects of NonpsychotropicCannabis and cannabinoid research · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akari AsabaDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Azabu University Kanagawa, Japan.
Tatsuya HattoriDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Azabu University Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazutaka MogiDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Azabu University Kanagawa, Japan.
Takefumi KikusuiDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Azabu University Kanagawa, Japan.
Azabu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male-female interaction is important for finding a suitable mating partner and for ensuring reproductive success. Male sexual signals such as pheromones transmit information and social and sexual status to females, and exert powerful effects on the mate preference and reproductive biology of females. Likewise, male vocalizations are attractive to females and enhance reproductive function in many animals. Interestingly, females' preference for male pheromones and vocalizations is associated with their genetic background, to avoid inbreeding. Moreover, based on acoustic cues, olfactory signals have significant effects on mate choice in mice, suggesting mate choice involves multisensory integration. In this review, we synopsize the effects of both olfactory and auditory cues on female behavior and neuroendocrine functions. We also discuss how these male signals are integrated and processed in the brain to regulate behavior and reproductive function.

Indexed as

mousemultisensory integrationneural circuitpheromonesreproductionultrasonic vocalizations

Identifiers

PMID25140125
PMCPMC4122165
OpenAlexW2155675395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.