ArticleFood & nutrition research2014
Socioeconomic differences in selected dietary habits among Norwegian 13-14 year-olds: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Food & nutrition research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Diet Score Assessing Norwegian Adolescents' Adherence to Dietary Recommendations-Development and Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Score.Nutrients · 2016Trial
- Daily Use of Caloric and Artificial Sweeteners Among Hungarian Adults with Diabetes: Socioeconomic and Dietary Associations.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Co-creating innovative and accepted legume-based dishes for school canteens with adolescents in a low socioeconomic area.Food quality and preference · 2025Article
- The impact of ultra-processed foods and unprocessed or minimally processed foods on the quality of life among adolescents: a longitudinal study from China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Food literacy and diet quality in young vegans, lacto-ovo vegetarians, pescatarians, flexitarians and omnivores.Public health nutrition · 2023Article
- Article
- Dietary Advice to Support Glycaemic Control and Weight Management in Women with Type 1 Diabetes during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Article
- A Traditional Costa Rican Adolescents' Diet Score Is a Valid Tool to Capture Diet Quality and Identify Sociodemographic Groups With Suboptimal Diet.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Food intake in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study from 2009/2010 to 2015/2016.Journal of nutritional science · 2021Article
- Socioeconomic Disparities in Diet Vary According to Migration Status among Adolescents in Belgium.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Mediation of psychosocial determinants in the relation between socio-economic status and adolescents' diet quality.European journal of nutrition · 2018Article
- Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and artificially sweetened beverages from childhood to adulthood in relation to socioeconomic status - 15 years follow-up in Norway.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018Article
- Article
- Fibre-Related Dietary Patterns: Socioeconomic Barriers to Adequate Fibre Intake in Polish Adolescents. A Short Report.Nutrients · 2017Article
- Family Affluence and the Eating Habits of 11- to 15-Year-Old Czech Adolescents: HBSC 2002 and 2014.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Article
- Dietary intake, leisure time activities and obesity among adolescents in Western Sweden: a cross-sectional study.Nutrition journal · 2016Article
- Trends in Food Habits and Their Relation to Socioeconomic Status among Nordic Adolescents 2001/2002-2009/2010.PloS one · 2016Article
- Family socioeconomic status and nutrition habits of 7-8 year old children: cross-sectional Lithuanian COSI study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2015Article
- Diet inequality prevails among consumers interested and knowledgeable in nutrition.Food & nutrition research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial inequalities in health are a major and even growing problem in all European countries.
objectiveThe aim of the present study was to describe 1) differences in dietary habits among Norwegian adolescents by gender and socioeconomic status; 2) differences in self-reported knowledge of dietary guidelines among their parents according to socioeconomic status.
designIn 2012, a cross-sectional study where students filled in a web-based food frequency questionnaire at school was conducted in nine lower secondary schools in Vest-Agder County, Norway. Socioeconomic status (SES) and knowledge of dietary guidelines were obtained from the parents using a web-based questionnaire. In total, 517 ninth-grade students (mean age 13.9) out of 742 invited students participated in the study, giving a participation rate of 69.7%. The total number of dyads with information on both parents and students was 308 (41.5%).
resultsThe findings indicate that there is a tendency for girls to have a healthier diet than boys, with greater intake of fruits and vegetables (girls intake in median 3.5 units per day and boys 2.9 units per day), and lower intake of soft drinks (girls 0.25 l in median versus boys 0.5 l per week). Students from families with higher SES reported a significant higher intake of vegetables and fish, and lower intake of soft drinks and fast food than those from lower SES. Parents with higher SES reported a significantly better knowledge of dietary guidelines compared to those with lower SES.
conclusionsDifferences in dietary habits were found between groups of students by gender and SES. Differences were also found in parents' self-reported knowledge of dietary guidelines. This social patterning should be recognized in public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.