Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25140045›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2015

Smoking restrictions in homes after implementation of a smoking ban in public places.

Sylvia Kairouz, Benoit Lasnier, Tsvetelina Mihaylova, Annie Montreuil, Joanna E Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Enactment of Legislative (Public) Smoking Bans on Voluntary Home Smoking Restrictions: A Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sylvia KairouzDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; sylvia.kairouz@concordia.ca.
Benoit LasnierInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Surveillance, Research, and Evaluation, Tobacco Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
Tsvetelina MihaylovaLifestyle and Addiction Research Lab, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada;
Annie MontreuilInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Surveillance, Research, and Evaluation, Tobacco Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
Joanna E CohenJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Concordia University · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis Canadian study examines the prevalence of smoking restrictions in homes before and after the implementation of a public smoking ban, and their relation to tobacco use and cessation among a cohort of smokers.

methodsData were from a longitudinal cohort study of 1,058 smokers in the province of Québec, Canada. Baseline data were collected through a population-based survey conducted 1 month before the implementation of the smoking ban with a representative sample of smokers. Follow-up data were collected 18 months after the ban with a response rate of 68%. Logistic regressions, paired t tests and chi-square statistics were used to examine the factors associated with smoking restrictions in homes, cigarette consumption, and quit attempts.

resultsMany smokers imposed partial or full smoking restrictions in their homes but proportions of smoke-free homes did not change significantly between baseline and follow-up. The presence of young children and nonsmokers significantly predicted full smoking restriction in the home. Knowledge about risks associated with exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and skepticism about the efficacy of methods to reduce exposure in the home also predicted maintenance of voluntary smoking restrictions in homes. The uptake of smoke-free homes was not associated with the quantity of cigarettes smoked or quit attempts.

conclusionsNo significant change in home smoking bans was found 18 months after implementation of a public smoking ban. There remains a need for efforts to better inform smokers about health risks from exposure to SHS in homes and the reality that strategies other than a total smoking ban inside the home are ineffective.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedCanadaChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID25140045
PMCPMC4832964
OpenAlexW2318458567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.