Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25139955›Full record

ArticleeLife2014

A suppression hierarchy among competing motor programs drives sequential grooming in Drosophila.

Andrew M Seeds, Primoz Ravbar, Phuong Chung, Stefanie Hampel, Frank M Midgley, Brett D Mensh, Julie H Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole-body 3D kinematics of freely behavingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inhibitory circuits control leg movements duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neurofibromin Deficiency Alters the Patterning and Prioritization of Motor Behaviors in a State-Dependent Manner.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew M SeedsJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States seeds.andrew@gmail.com.
Primoz RavbarJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.
Phuong ChungJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.
Stefanie HampelJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.
Frank M MidgleyJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.
Brett D MenshJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.
Julie H SimpsonJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States simpsonj@janelia.hhmi.org.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor sequences are formed through the serial execution of different movements, but how nervous systems implement this process remains largely unknown. We determined the organizational principles governing how dirty fruit flies groom their bodies with sequential movements. Using genetically targeted activation of neural subsets, we drove distinct motor programs that clean individual body parts. This enabled competition experiments revealing that the motor programs are organized into a suppression hierarchy; motor programs that occur first suppress those that occur later. Cleaning one body part reduces the sensory drive to its motor program, which relieves suppression of the next movement, allowing the grooming sequence to progress down the hierarchy. A model featuring independently evoked cleaning movements activated in parallel, but selected serially through hierarchical suppression, was successful in reproducing the grooming sequence. This provides the first example of an innate motor sequence implemented by the prevailing model for generating human action sequences.

Indexed as

AbdomenAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDustForelimbGroomingHeadHindlimbMaleMotor ActivityMovementNeuronsThoraxWings, AnimalDustaction selectionbehavioral choicecompeting motor programscompetitive queuinggrooming sequenceserial behavior

Identifiers

PMID25139955
PMCPMC4136539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.