Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25139782›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2014

Resistant or refractory hypertension: are they different?

Rodrigo Modolo, Ana Paula de Faria, Aurélio Almeida, Heitor Moreno

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06450327 (Resistant Hypertension An Open, Complicated), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06450327 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Resistant Hypertension An Open, Complicated ("Cum Plicare") or Complex ("Cum Plexus")

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Campinas, BrazilRan2024 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsHypertension, Resistant HypertensionArmsThis is a cross-sectional observational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Refractory hypertension: what do we know so far?Journal of human hypertension · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rodrigo ModoloLaboratory of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, FCM 10 Building, 1st Floor, Campinas, SP, Brazil, 13083-970.
Ana Paula de Faria
Aurélio Almeida
Heitor Moreno

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) consists in a condition where blood pressure (BP) levels remain uncontrolled despite the use of at least three drugs or if the control happens with four or more drugs. Throughout the last 50 years, it has been increasingly studied, and its phenotypes have been identified. The term refractory hypertension has been used concurrently with RHTN all those years, but in the last decade, it has been applied to the most afflicted part of RHTN--defined as the uncontrolled RHTN or as the uncontrolled RHTN who needs five or more drugs. Differences between those two phenotypes are being recently identified, especially classifying refractory subjects as having more: (1) cardiovascular risk, (2) target organ damage, (3) African-descending race, (4) coronary heart disease and myocardial ischemia, (5) aldosterone excess, (6) deregulation of adipokines, and (7) possible sympathetic hyperactivation. We review the most important studies in both resistant and refractory hypertension to gather the up-to-date data regarding the characteristics of these two high-risk groups of patients.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansHypertensionRisk FactorsVascular ResistanceAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.