ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2014
Out-of-office blood pressure improves risk stratification in normotension and prehypertension people.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Home blood pressure control and prescribing patterns of anti-hypertensive medications in a home blood pressure-based hypertension-specialized clinic in Japan: a sub-analysis of the Ohasama study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Structure and dynamics of the course of chronic non-infectious somatic diseases in patients during war events on the territory of Ukraine.BMC public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review addresses to what extent out-of-office blood pressure, the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and the self-measured home blood pressure, refines conventional blood pressure-based risk stratification across increasing blood pressure categories, in particular individuals assumed to be associated with no or only mildly increased risk. Compared with sustained normotension, individuals with prehypertension as well as masked hypertension tend to be developed to true hypertension. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement refines risk stratification among prehypertensive people. Home blood pressure is more useful for the prediction of cerebrovascular diseases than conventional blood pressure, by replacing information from conventional to home blood pressure in risk stratification system. Furthermore, the two participant-level meta-analyses demonstrated that the out-of-office blood pressure substantially refines risk stratification in normotension and prehypertension, particularly among participants with masked hypertension. Properly organized randomized clinical trials are required to demonstrate that identification and treatment of masked hypertension, compared with the current standard care based on conventional pressure, lead to the reduction of cardiovascular diseases in population and are cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25139777What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.