Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25139762›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2014

Contributions of different kainate receptor subunits to the properties of recombinant homomeric and heteromeric receptors.

M T Fisher, J L Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Subunit-selective iGluR antagonists can potentiate heteromeric receptor responses by blocking desensitization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Amino-terminal domains of kainate receptors determine the differential dependence on Neto auxiliary subunits for trafficking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M T FisherDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.
J L FisherDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA. Electronic address: jfisher@uscmed.sc.edu.
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Subunit dependent properties of kainate receptorsR01NS065869 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FISHER, JANET L, MOTT, DAVID D · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065869NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS065869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tetrameric kainate receptors can be assembled from a combination of five different subunit subtypes. While GluK1-3 subunits can form homomeric receptors, GluK4 and GluK5 require a heteromeric partner to assemble, traffic to the membrane surface, and produce a functional channel. Previous studies have shown that incorporation of a GluK4 or GluK5 subunit changes both receptor pharmacology and channel kinetics. We directly compared the functional characteristics of recombinant receptors containing either GluK4 or GluK5 in combination with the GluK1 or GluK2 subunit. In addition, we took advantage of mutations within the agonist binding sites of GluK1, GluK2, or GluK5 to isolate the response of the wild-type partner within the heteromeric receptor. Our results suggest that GluK1 and GluK2 differ primarily in their pharmacological properties, but that GluK4 and GluK5 have distinct functional characteristics. In particular, while binding of agonist to only the GluK5 subunit appears to activate the channel to a non-desensitizing state, binding to GluK4 does produce some desensitization. This suggests that GluK4 and GluK5 differ fundamentally in their contribution to receptor desensitization. In addition, mutation of the agonist binding site of GluK5 results in a heteromeric receptor with a glutamate sensitivity similar to homomeric GluK1 or GluK2 receptors, but which requires higher agonist concentrations to produce desensitization. This suggests that onset of desensitization in heteromeric receptors is determined more by the number of subunits bound to agonist than by the identity of those subunits. The distinct, concentration-dependent properties observed with heteromeric receptors in response to glutamate or kainate are consistent with a model in which either subunit can activate the channel, but in which occupancy of both subunits within a dimer is needed to allow desensitization of GluK2/K5 receptors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesGluK2 Kainate ReceptorGlutamic AcidHEK293 CellsHumansKainic Acid ReceptorsMembrane PotentialsMutationProtein SubunitsRatsRecombinant ProteinsGluK2 Kainate ReceptorGlutamic AcidKainic Acid ReceptorsProtein SubunitsRecombinant Proteinsglutamatekainate receptorsmutagenesispatch-clamp

Identifiers

PMID25139762
PMCPMC4172534
OpenAlexW2047215867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.