Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25139260›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology progress

Development and scale-up of a commercial fed batch refolding process for an anti-CD22 two chain immunotoxin.

Thomas Linke, Matthew T Aspelund, Christopher Thompson, Guoling Xi, Andrew Fulton, Michaela Wendeler, Timothy M Pabst, Xiangyang Wang, William K Wang, Kripa Ram and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Wanted: more monitoring and control during inclusion body processing.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  7. Interactions BetweenFrontiers in oncology · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Camelid VBiotechnology journal · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas LinkeDept. of Purification Process Sciences, MedImmune, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878.
Matthew T Aspelund
Christopher Thompson
Guoling Xi
Andrew Fulton
Michaela Wendeler
Timothy M Pabst
Xiangyang Wang
William K Wang
Kripa Ram
Alan K Hunter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the development and scale-up of a novel two chain immunotoxin refolding process. This work provides a case study comparing a clinical manufacturing process and the commercial process developed to replace it. While the clinical process produced high quality material, it suffered from low yield and high yield variability. A systematic approach to process development and understanding led to a number of improvements that were implemented in the commercial process. These include a shorter inclusion body recovery process, limiting the formation of an undesired deamidated species and the implementation of fed batch dilution refolding for increased refold titers. The use of a combination of urea, arginine and DTT for capture column cleaning restored the binding capacity of the capture step column and resulted in consistent capture step yields compared to the clinical process. Scalability is shown with data from 250 L and 950 L scale refolding processes. Compared to the clinical process it replaces, the commercial process demonstrated a greater than fivefold improvement in volumetric productivity at the 950 L refolding scale.

Indexed as

Protein RefoldingArginineDithiothreitolEscherichia coliFermentationImmunotoxinsInclusion BodiesSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 2SolubilityUreaArginineDithiothreitolImmunotoxinsSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 2Ureaimmunotoxininclusion bodymoxetumomab pasudotoxrefoldingscale-up

Identifiers

PMID25139260
PMCPMC4283723
OpenAlexW2087076790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.