ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Glycolytic activity with 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts final neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three-Dimensional Positron Emission Mammography versus Whole Body Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2017Trial
- Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Review
- PET Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Metabolic adaptation towards glycolysis supports resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple negative breast cancers.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Review
- Prediction of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using baseline FDG PET heterogeneity features in breast cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer.European journal of breast health · 2023Article
- GlucoCEST MRI for the Evaluation Response to Chemotherapeutic and Metabolic Treatments in a Murine Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Comparison with[Molecular imaging and biology · 2022Article
- The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer.Molecular imaging and biology · 2019Review
- Prediction of Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival by theContrast media & molecular imaging · 2019Article
- Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [Molecular imaging and biology · 2017Article
- Glucose is a key driver for GLUT1-mediated nanoparticles internalization in breast cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to explore the relation between glycolytic metabolism assessed by (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and final neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) response in locally advanced breast tumors. Of women with breast cancer, 126 were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT previous to NC. Standard uptake value (SUV) max was calculated in the primary tumor. After NC, residual primary tumor specimen was histopathologically classified according to Miller and Payne tumor regression grades (TRG), from G1 to G5 and in response groups as good responders (G4 or G5), partial responders (G2 or G3), and non-responders (G1). Furthermore, residual lesions were classified following a binary assessment as responders (G4 or G5) and non-responders (the rest of cases). The relationship between SUV max with TRG and response groups was evaluated. Of tumors, 127 were assessed (a patient had bilateral breast lesions). TRG were as follows: G1 (27), G2 (27), G3 (32), G4 (11), and G5 (30). Forty-one were classified as good responders, 59 as partial responders, and 27 as non-responders. For the binary assessment, 41 lesions were classified as responders and 86 as non-responders. We found statistical differences (p=0.02) between the mean SUV max and TRG with greater SUV values for G5 compared to the other TRG. Good responders showed greater mean SUV max ± SD compared to partial responders and non-responders (10.51 ± 6.64 for good responders, 6.94 ± 5.81 for partial responders, and 5.23 ± 2.76 for non-responders; p=0.001). Baseline tumor metabolism assessing by FDG PET/CT was associated with the final histopathologic status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with greater SUV max values for good responders compared to the less responder cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.