Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25139100›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Glycolytic activity with 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts final neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer.

Ana María García Vicente, Miguel Ángel Cruz Mora, Antonio Alberto León Martín, María Del Mar Muñoz Sánchez, Fernanda Relea Calatayud, Ober Van Gómez López, Ruth Espinosa Aunión, Ana Gonzalez Ageitos, Angel Soriano Castrejón

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [Molecular imaging and biology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ana María García VicenteNuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, C/ Obispo Rafael Torija s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain, amgarcia@sescam.jccm.es.
Miguel Ángel Cruz Mora
Antonio Alberto León Martín
María Del Mar Muñoz Sánchez
Fernanda Relea Calatayud
Ober Van Gómez López
Ruth Espinosa Aunión
Ana Gonzalez Ageitos
Angel Soriano Castrejón
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real · ESHospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado · ESHospital Virgen de la Luz · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to explore the relation between glycolytic metabolism assessed by (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and final neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) response in locally advanced breast tumors. Of women with breast cancer, 126 were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT previous to NC. Standard uptake value (SUV) max was calculated in the primary tumor. After NC, residual primary tumor specimen was histopathologically classified according to Miller and Payne tumor regression grades (TRG), from G1 to G5 and in response groups as good responders (G4 or G5), partial responders (G2 or G3), and non-responders (G1). Furthermore, residual lesions were classified following a binary assessment as responders (G4 or G5) and non-responders (the rest of cases). The relationship between SUV max with TRG and response groups was evaluated. Of tumors, 127 were assessed (a patient had bilateral breast lesions). TRG were as follows: G1 (27), G2 (27), G3 (32), G4 (11), and G5 (30). Forty-one were classified as good responders, 59 as partial responders, and 27 as non-responders. For the binary assessment, 41 lesions were classified as responders and 86 as non-responders. We found statistical differences (p=0.02) between the mean SUV max and TRG with greater SUV values for G5 compared to the other TRG. Good responders showed greater mean SUV max ± SD compared to partial responders and non-responders (10.51 ± 6.64 for good responders, 6.94 ± 5.81 for partial responders, and 5.23 ± 2.76 for non-responders; p=0.001). Baseline tumor metabolism assessing by FDG PET/CT was associated with the final histopathologic status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with greater SUV max values for good responders compared to the less responder cancers.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18GlycolysisNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID25139100
OpenAlexW2095304764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.