ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2014
Liver resection for colorectal metastases: results and prognostic factors with 10-year follow-up.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histopathological prognostic factors for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Histology and histopathology · 2021Pooled it
- An Analysis of Clinicopathological Outcomes and the Utility of Preoperative MRI for Patients Undergoing Resection of Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Prognostic impact of additive chemotherapy after curative resection of metachronous colorectal liver metastasis: a single-centre retrospective study.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Prospective Non-Randomized Study of Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Resection Margin of Colo-Rectal Liver Metastases.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Proposal of Two Prognostic Models for the Prediction of 10-Year Survival after Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases.HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery · 2018Article
- Role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in colorectal liver metastases: a review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeActual 5-year survival rates after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are 25-45%, whereas 10-year survival rates are extrapolated from survival curves. Few studies have reported long-term survivors with 10 years of actual follow-up. Therefore, no recurrences occurring after 10-plus years have been reported. The aim of our study was to analyze actual 10-year survival rates and prognostic factors.
methodsClinical data of patients with CLM who had undergone first liver resection in our center between January 1990 and December 2000 were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsEighty-nine patients of mean age 64 years were studied. Three patients were excluded from the study: one because of postoperative death, and two from being lost to follow-up. All other subjects had a potential 10-year follow-up. Only 33% patients received perioperative chemotherapy. The actual 10-year overall and disease-free survival rate were 22 and 19%, respectively. Poor prognostic factors were disease-free interval less than 1 year, wedge liver resection, clinical risk score>2, segment 1 CLM location, and peritumoral lymphangitis. Good prognostic factors were tumors having mucinous components in primary tumor and CLM located in the right lobe.
conclusionsWith actual long-term follow-up for 10 years, disease-free survival rate is 19% and mainly depends on surgical management. Recurrence continues to occur more than 5 years after liver resection for CLM; cure cannot be assumed at this time. Clinical risk score is a good predictor of cure and should be taken into account when choosing perioperative treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.