Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25138809›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Evaluation of My Medication Passport: a patient-completed aide-memoire designed by patients, for patients, to help towards medicines optimisation.

Susan Barber, Kandarp Thakkar, Vanessa Marvin, Bryony Dean Franklin, Derek Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient passports for rare diseases: results of a pilot study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Creating opportunities for patient participation in managing medications across transitions of care through formal and informal modes of communication.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The role of patients and carers in diffusing a health-care innovation: A case study of "My Medication Passport".Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  8. Successful Healthcare Improvements From Translating Evidence in complex systems (SHIFT-Evidence): simple rules to guide practice and research.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan BarberDepartment of Pharmacy, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kandarp ThakkarDepartment of Pharmacy, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, UK.
Vanessa MarvinDepartment of Pharmacy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Bryony Dean FranklinDepartment of Pharmacy, Centre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Derek BellFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK Department of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA passport-sized booklet, designed by patients for patients to record details about their medicines, has been developed as part of a wider project focusing on improving prescribing in the elderly ('ImPE'). We undertook an evaluation of 'My Medication Passport' to gain an understanding of its value to patients and how it may be used in communications about medicines.

settingThe Passport was launched in secondary care with the initial users being older people discharged home after an admission to one of the four North West London participating Trusts. The uptake subsequently spread to other (community) locations and other age groups.

participantsWe recruited more than 200 patients from a cohort who had been given a passport as part of the improvement projects at one of four sites. Of them, 63% (133) completed the structured telephone questionnaire including 27% for whom English was not their first language. Approximately half of the respondents were male and 40% were over 70 years of age.

resultsMore than half of the respondents had found their medication passport useful or helpful in some way; 42% through sharing details from it with others (most frequently family, carer or doctor) or using it as a platform for conversations with healthcare professionals. One-third of those questioned carried the passport with them at all times.

conclusionsMy Medication Passport has been positively evaluated; we have a better understanding of how it is used by patients, what they are recording and how it can be an aid to dialogue about medicines with family, carers and healthcare professionals. Further development and spread is underway including an App for smartphones that will be subject to wider evaluation to include feedback from clinicians.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth Records, PersonalPatient SatisfactionPharmaceutical PreparationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultPharmaceutical PreparationsGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)THERAPEUTICS

Identifiers

PMID25138809
PMCPMC4139624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.