Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25138807›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2014

MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures.

Gavin Daker-White, Rebecca Hays, Aneez Esmail, Brian Minor, Wendy Barlow, Benjamin Brown, Thomas Blakeman, Peter Bower

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Developing a patient safety guide for primary care: A co-design approach involving patients, carers and clinicians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gavin Daker-WhiteNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (Greater Manchester PSTRC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rebecca HaysNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (Greater Manchester PSTRC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Aneez EsmailNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (Greater Manchester PSTRC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Brian MinorNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (Greater Manchester PSTRC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Wendy BarlowNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (Greater Manchester PSTRC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Benjamin BrownCentre for Health Informatics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Thomas BlakemanCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peter BowerCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreasing numbers of older people are living with multiple long-term health conditions but global healthcare systems and clinical guidelines have traditionally focused on the management of single conditions. Having two or more long-term conditions, or 'multimorbidity', is associated with a range of adverse consequences and poor outcomes and could put patients at increased risk of safety failures. Traditionally, most research into patient safety failures has explored hospital or inpatient settings. Much less is known about patient safety failures in primary care. Our core aims are to understand the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures, to explore the different ways in which patients and services respond (or fail to respond), and to identify opportunities for intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to undertake an applied ethnographic study of patients with multimorbidity. Patients' interactions and environments, relevant to their healthcare, will be studied through observations, diary methods and semistructured interviews. A framework, based on previous studies, will be used to organise the collection and analysis of field notes, observations and other qualitative data. This framework includes the domains: access breakdowns, communication breakdowns, continuity of care errors, relationship breakdowns and technical errors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee for Wales. An individual case study approach is likely to be most fruitful for exploring the mechanisms by which multimorbidity leads to safety failures. A longitudinal and multiperspective approach will allow for the constant comparison of patient, carer and healthcare worker expectations and experiences related to the provision, integration and management of complex care. This data will be used to explore ways of engaging patients and carers more in their own care using shared decision-making, patient empowerment or other relevant models.

Indexed as

CommunicationComorbidityContinuity of Patient CareHealth Services AccessibilityMedical ErrorsPatient SafetyPhysician-Patient RelationsHumansPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementUnited KingdomQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID25138807
PMCPMC4139641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.