Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25138788›Full record

Observational studyIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2014

Antibiotic use in acute pancreatitis: an Indian multicenter observational study.

Rupjyoti Talukdar, Pankaj Ingale, Hrushikesh P Choudhury, Rajan Dhingra, Shiran Shetty, Harshad Joshi, K R Pradeep, Lalatendu Mahapatra, Subhasish Mazumder, J K Pradeep and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Rupjyoti TalukdarAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
Pankaj Ingale
Hrushikesh P Choudhury
Rajan Dhingra
Shiran Shetty
Harshad Joshi
K R Pradeep
Lalatendu Mahapatra
Subhasish Mazumder
J K Pradeep
Bhavesh Thakker
Adarsh Chaudhary
Ajay Kumar
D Nageshwar Reddy
G V Rao
H Ramesh
Naresh Bhat
Pramod Garg
Rakesh Kochhar
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INApollo Hospitals · INMedanta The Medicity · INMedical Trust Hospital · INBLK Super Speciality Hospital · INColumbia Asia · INIndraprastha Apollo Hospitals · INKG Hospital · INLakeshore Hospital · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProphylactic antibiotics are used frequently for acute pancreatitis (AP). Consensus guidelines do not recommend this currently, based on moderate quality evidence. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the antibiotic use pattern in AP in India and propose a risk-directed approach to antibiotic use in AP. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis multicenter study was conducted from 1 May 2013 to 31 July 2013. Eleven participants from eight tertiary centers completed a questionnaire that captured patient demographics, etiology, admission status, presence of (peri)pancreatic necrosis, severity of pancreatitis, details of antibiotic use, and clinical outcomes (total hospital stay, persistent organ failure, need for ICU, total days in ICU, development of infections, in-hospital mortality).

resultsA total of 200 proformas were analyzed. Seventy-three (36.5 %) had acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). Eighty-nine (44.5 %), 52 (26 %), and 55 (27.5 %) patients had mild AP (MAP), moderately severe AP (MSAP), and severe AP (SAP), respectively. Forty-five (22.5 %) patients developed infections (unifocal 29; multifocal 16). One hundred thirty-four (67 %) patients received antibiotics, of which 89 (66.4 %) received prophylactic, while 45 (33.6 %) received therapeutic antibiotics. The distribution of antibiotic use according to the severity of AP was 43 (48.3 %) in patients with MAP (prophylactic in 41; therapeutic in 2), 36 (69.2 %) in patients with MSAP (prophylactic in 29; therapeutic in 7), and 55 (100 %) in patients with SAP (prophylactic in 19; therapeutic in 36). Therapeutic antibiotics were prescribed based on culture and sensitivity in 21 (46.7 %) patients.

conclusionsDespite nonrecommendation, prophylactic antibiotics are used frequently in AP. We emphasize on the need for multicenter randomized controlled trials on prophylactic antibiotics for AP based on a risk-directed approach, rather than a "blanket approach."

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisMulticenter Studies as TopicPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildContraindicationsFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25138788
OpenAlexW1982263141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.