Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25138544›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2015

Injury Response of Resected Human Brain Tissue In Vitro.

Ronald W H Verwer, Arja A Sluiter, Rawien A Balesar, Johannes C Baaijen, Philip C de Witt Hamer, Dave Speijer, Yichen Li, Dick F Swaab

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Modeling the Human Brain WithFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Doublecortin-expressing cell types in temporal lobe epilepsy.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald W H VerwerNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arja A SluiterNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rawien A BalesarNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes C BaaijenDepartment of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip C de Witt HamerDepartment of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dave SpeijerDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yichen LiNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick F SwaabNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain injury affects a significant number of people each year. Organotypic cultures from resected normal neocortical tissue provide unique opportunities to study the cellular and neuropathological consequences of severe injury of adult human brain tissue in vitro. The in vitro injuries caused by resection (interruption of the circulation) and aggravated by the preparation of slices (severed neuronal and glial processes and blood vessels) reflect the reaction of human brain tissue to severe injury. We investigated this process using immunocytochemical markers, reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis. Essential features were rapid shrinkage of neurons, loss of neuronal marker expression and proliferation of reactive cells that expressed Nestin and Vimentin. Also, microglia generally responded strongly, whereas the response of glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive astrocytes appeared to be more variable. Importantly, some reactive cells also expressed both microglia and astrocytic markers, thus confounding their origin. Comparison with post-mortem human brain tissue obtained at rapid autopsies suggested that the reactive process is not a consequence of epilepsy.

Indexed as

BrainEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKi-67 AntigenMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurogliaNeuronsOrgan Culture TechniquesRNA, MessengerKi-67 AntigenNerve Tissue ProteinsRNA, Messengerbrain injuryepilepsyhuman neocortexneuronal degenerationreactive glial cellstissue culture

Identifiers

PMID25138544
PMCPMC8029080
OpenAlexW1503050567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.