SynthesisClinical orthopaedics and related research2015
Systematic review of literature of cemented femoral components: what is the durability at minimum 20 years followup?
Synthesis in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increased risk of periprosthetic fracture associated with decreased aseptic loosening in C-stem compared with the Charnley Elite Plus in primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Techniques for removal of well-fixed implants and cement in revision total elbow arthroplasty.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2024Review
- [Current design and cement mantle thickness in hip arthroplasty : Theory and analysis of register data].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Can Selected Use of Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Components in a Broad Population Produce Comparable Results Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis?The Journal of arthroplasty · 2023Article
- MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study.Cureus · 2022Article
- Minimum ten-year outcome of a triple-tapered femoral stem implanted with line-to-line cementing technique.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Analysis of Chemisorbed Tribo-Film for Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Joint Prostheses by Raman Spectroscopy.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2021Article
- Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021Review
- Asymmetry of the Cross-sectional Area of the Gluteus Medius Muscle Persists Eight Years after Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis of the Hip.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Effect of Physiological Saline Solution Contamination on Selected Mechanical Properties of Seasoned Acrylic Bone Cements of Medium and High Viscosity.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- What Is the Long-term (27- to 32-year) Survivorship of an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Femoral Component and Survival in Patients Younger Than 50 Years?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020Article
- Does surgical approach influence mid- to long-term patient-reported outcomes after primary total hip replacement? A comparison of the 3 main surgical approaches.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2020Article
- Biomechanical behaviour of a French femoral component with thin cement mantle: The 'French paradox' may not be a paradox after all.Bone & joint research · 2018Article
- Particle disease really does exist.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Article
- Excellent mid-term results of a new polished tapered modular cemented stem: a study of 113 hip replacements with minimum 5-year follow-up.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2017Article
- The influence of cement thickness on stem subsidence and cement creep in a collarless polished tapered stem: When are thick cement mantles detrimental?Bone & joint research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCemented femoral total hip arthroplasty may be one of the most successful surgical interventions of all time. However, although results are very encouraging over the early to mid-term followup, relatively few studies have analyzed the durability of these implants beyond 20 years followup. To evaluate the performance of contemporary implants, it is important to understand how previous implants perform at 20 or more years of followup; one way to do this is to aggregate the available data in the form of a systematic review. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How durable is cemented femoral fixation in the long term (minimum 20-year followup) with respect to aseptic loosening? (2) Is the durability of cemented femoral fixation dependent on age of the patient? (3) Are the long-term results of the cemented femoral fixation dependent on any identifiable characteristics of the prosthesis such as surface finish?
methodsA systematic review was performed to identify long-term studies of cemented femoral components. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to 1228 articles found with a search in PubMed and EMBASE, 17 studies with a minimum of 20-year followup on cemented femoral components were thoroughly analyzed in an attempt to answer the questions of this review. The quality of the studies reviewed was assessed with the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) instrument. All studies were case series and cohort sizes ranged from 110 to 2000 hips for patients older than 50 years of age and 41 to 93 hips for patients younger than 50 years at the time of surgery.
resultsAmong the six case series performed in patients older than 50 years of age, survivorship for aseptic loosening of the femoral component ranged from 86% to 98% at 20 years followup. There were no obvious differences for younger patients when analyzing the five studies in patients younger than age 50 years in which survivorship free from aseptic loosening for these studies ranged from 77% at 20 years in one study and 68% to 94% at 25 years in the other studies. Although data pooling could not be performed because of heterogeneity of the studies included here, it appeared that stems with a rougher surface finish did not perform as well as polished stems; survivorship of stems with rougher surface finishes varied between 86% and 87%, whereas those with smoother finishes ranged between 93.5% and 98% at 20 years.
conclusionsExcellent long-term fixation in both older and younger patients can be obtained with cemented, polished femoral stems. These results provide material for comparison with procedures performed with newer cementing techniques and newer designs, both cemented and cementless, at this extended duration of followup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.