Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25138307›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2014

Residents' and preceptors' perceptions of the use of the iPad for clinical teaching in a family medicine residency program.

Douglas Archibald, Colla J Macdonald, Judith Plante, Rebecca J Hogue, Javier Fiallos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mobile learning in clinical settings: unveiling the paradox.Korean journal of medical education · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building a CTU Orientation Handbook iPadCanadian medical education journal · 2019
    Article
  9. Can Tablet Computers Enhance Faculty Teaching?Journal of graduate medical education · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Douglas ArchibaldDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, 43 Bruyère St,, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8, Canada. darchibald@bruyere.org.
Colla J Macdonald
Judith Plante
Rebecca J Hogue
Javier Fiallos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs Family Medicine programs across Canada are transitioning into a competency-based curriculum, medical students and clinical teachers are increasingly incorporating tablet computers in their work and educational activities. The purpose of this pilot study was to identify how preceptors and residents use tablet computers to implement and adopt a new family medicine curriculum and to evaluate how they access applications (apps) through their tablet in an effort to support and enhance effective teaching and learning.

methodsResidents and preceptors (n = 25) from the Family Medicine program working at the Pembroke Regional Hospital in Ontario, Canada, were given iPads and training on how to use the device in clinical teaching and learning activities and how to access the online curriculum. Data regarding the use and perceived contribution of the iPads were collected through surveys and focus groups. This mixed methods research used analysis of survey responses to support the selection of questions for focus groups.

resultsReported results were categorized into: curriculum and assessment; ease of use; portability; apps and resources; and perceptions about the use of the iPad in teaching/learning setting. Most participants agreed on the importance of accessing curriculum resources through the iPad but recognized that these required enhancements to facilitate use. The iPad was considered to be more useful for activities involving output of information than for input. Participants' responses regarding the ease of use of mobile technology were heterogeneous due to the diversity of computer proficiency across users. Residents had a slightly more favorable opinion regarding the iPad's contribution to teaching/learning compared to preceptors.

conclusionsiPad's interface should be fully enhanced to allow easy access to online curriculum and its built-in resources. The differences in computer proficiency level among users should be reduced by sharing knowledge through workshops led by more skillful iPad users. To facilitate collection of information through the iPad, the design of electronic data-input forms should consider the participants' reported negative perceptions towards typing data through mobile devices. Technology deployment projects should gather sufficient evidence from pilot studies in order to guide efforts to adapt resources and infrastructure to relevant needs of Family Medicine teachers and learners.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersComputer-Assisted InstructionComputers, HandheldInternship and ResidencyPreceptorshipCompetency-Based EducationComputer LiteracyCurriculumEducationFamily PracticeHumansOntarioPilot ProjectsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID25138307
PMCPMC4236569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.