Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25138104›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2015

Assessment of neonatal care in clinical training facilities in Kenya.

Jalemba Aluvaala, Rachael Nyamai, Fred Were, Aggrey Wasunna, Rose Kosgei, Jamlick Karumbi, David Gathara, Mike English, SIRCLE/Ministry of Health Hospital Survey Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04134689 (DOT Selfie), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04134689 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

DOT Selfie: A Mobile Health Intervention With Transfer of Social Bundle Incentives to Increase Treatment Adherence in Tuberculosis Patients in Uganda: A Randomized Control Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GeorgiaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled144ConditionsTuberculosisArmsDOT Selfie Intervention, In-person DOT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jalemba AluvaalaMinistry of Health, Government of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rachael NyamaiMinistry of Health, Government of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Fred WereDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Aggrey WasunnaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rose KosgeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jamlick KarumbiMinistry of Health, Government of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
David GatharaKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mike EnglishKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya Nuffield Department of Medicine & Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
SIRCLE/Ministry of Health Hospital Survey Group

Funding

Wellcome Trust 076827Wellcome Trust 084538Wellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 097170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAn audit of neonatal care services provided by clinical training centres was undertaken to identify areas requiring improvement as part of wider efforts to improve newborn survival in Kenya.

designCross-sectional study using indicators based on prior work in Kenya. Statistical analyses were descriptive with adjustment for clustering of data.

settingNeonatal units of 22 public hospitals. PATIENTS: Neonates aged <7 days.

main outcome measuresQuality of care was assessed in terms of availability of basic resources (principally equipment and drugs) and audit of case records for documentation of patient assessment and treatment at admission.

resultsAll hospitals had oxygen, 19/22 had resuscitation and phototherapy equipment, but some key resources were missing—for example kangaroo care was available in 14/22. Out of 1249 records, 56.9% (95% CI 36.2% to 77.6%) had a standard neonatal admission form. A median score of 0 out of 3 for symptoms of severe illness (IQR 0-3) and a median score of 6 out of 8 for signs of severe illness (IQR 4-7) were documented. Maternal HIV status was documented in 674/1249 (54%, 95% CI 41.9% to 66.1%) cases. Drug doses exceeded recommendations by >20% in prescriptions for penicillin (11.6%, 95% CI 3.4% to 32.8%) and gentamicin (18.5%, 95% CI 13.4% to 25%), respectively.

conclusionsBasic resources are generally available, but there are deficiencies in key areas. Poor documentation limits the use of routine data for quality improvement. Significant opportunities exist for improvement in service delivery and adherence to guidelines in hospitals providing professional training.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services ResearchHospitals, PublicHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalKenyaMaleMedical AuditQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareData CollectionEvidence Based MedicineHealth services researchMeasurementNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID25138104
PMCPMC4283661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.