Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25138051›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2014

Denosumab mimics the natural decoy receptor osteoprotegerin by interacting with its major binding site on RANKL.

Aneta Schieferdecker, Mareike Voigt, Kristoffer Riecken, Friederike Braig, Thorsten Schinke, Sonja Loges, Carsten Bokemeyer, Boris Fehse, Mascha Binder

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RANKL regulates male reproductive function.Nature communications · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  14. Denosumab in the treatment of giant cell tumor of the spine. Preliminary report, review of the literature and protocol proposal.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aneta SchieferdeckerDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, BMT with section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum / UCCH, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Mareike VoigtDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, BMT with section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum / UCCH, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kristoffer RieckenResearch Department Cell and Gene Therapy, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Friederike BraigDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, BMT with section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum / UCCH, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Thorsten SchinkeDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sonja LogesDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, BMT with section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum / UCCH, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute for Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Carsten BokemeyerDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, BMT with section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum / UCCH, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Boris FehseResearch Department Cell and Gene Therapy, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Mascha BinderDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, BMT with section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum / UCCH, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Cancer Center Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone homeostasis critically relies on the RANKL-RANK-OPG axis which can be targeted by the fully human monoclonal antibody denosumab in conditions with increased bone resporption such as bone metastases. The binding site and therefore the molecular mechanism by which this antibody inhibits RANKL has not been characterized so far. Here, we used random peptide phage display library screenings to identify the denosumab epitope on RANKL. Alignments of phage derived peptide sequences with RANKL suggested that this antibody recognized a linear epitope between position T233 and Y241. Mutational analysis confirmed the core residues as critical for this interaction. The spatial localization of this epitope on a 3-dimensional model of RANKL showed that it overlapped with the major binding sites of OPG and RANK on RANKL. We conclude that denosumab inhibits RANKL by both functional and molecular mimicry of the natural decoy receptor OPG.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBinding SitesBone NeoplasmsDenosumabEpitope MappingEpitopesHEK293 CellsHumansModels, MolecularOsteoprotegerinPeptide LibraryPeptidesRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BSequence Analysis, ProteinAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDenosumabEpitopesOsteoprotegerinPeptide LibraryPeptidesRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BTNFRSF11A protein, humanTNFSF11 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25138051
PMCPMC4196153
OpenAlexW2100696762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.