Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25137484›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2014

Variability and reliability of diurnal cortisol in younger and older adults: implications for design decisions.

Suzanne C Segerstrom, Ian A Boggero, Gregory T Smith, Sandra E Sephton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Bayesian Modeling Approach to Optimize Longitudinal Biomarker Sampling Schedules Using Hormonal Data.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suzanne C SegerstromDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, United States. Electronic address: segerstrom@uky.edu.
Ian A BoggeroDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, United States.
Gregory T SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, United States.
Sandra E SephtonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, United States.

Funding

University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Core Center - Biomarker CoreP30AG028383 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GOLD, BRIAN TIMOTHY, VAN ELDIK, LINDA J · 2006 to 2020
$23.3M
Self-Regulation, Immunological Aging, and Health in Older AdultsR01AG026307 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GOLD, BRIAN TIMOTHY, SEGERSTROM, SUZANNE C. · 2006 to 2022
$7.5M
OPTIMISM AND CELLULAR IMMUNITY DURING ACADEMIC STRESSR01MH061531 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SEGERSTROM, SUZANNE C · 2001 to 2005
$1.0M
Self-Regulation and Aging: Substrates and Health ConsequencesK02AG033629 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SEGERSTROM, SUZANNE C. · 2012 to 2016
$703k
NIA NIH HHS AG026307-R01NIA NIH HHS AG028383-P30NIA NIH HHS AG033629-K02NIA NIH HHS K02 AG033629NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028383NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026307NIMH NIH HHS MH61531-R01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extant research is inconclusive regarding the best sampling methods to construct reliable measures of between-person differences in derived parameters of diurnal cortisol, and no study provides such recommendations for detecting within-person changes. These studies determined how many days of sampling are necessary to assess between-person differences and within-person changes over multiple occasions in diurnal mean, diurnal slope, and area under the curve (AUC). Generalizability and decision analyses were conducted on diurnal salivary cortisol data from two separate longitudinal studies, one with younger adults (N=124) and one with older adults (N=148). In both studies, results indicated that 3 days of data collection provided the minimal level of reliability in mean cortisol to detect between-person differences; 4-8 days were necessary to reliably assess AUC, and 10 days for cortisol slope. Similarly, in order to reliably characterize within-person changes across occasions, at least 3 days of data collection were needed for mean cortisol and AUC and 5-8 days for slope. Results also indicated that only two samples per day, taken morning and evening, could faithfully reproduce the diurnal slope calculated from 3 or 4 samples (r=.97-.99). Instead of having participants provide many samples per day over the course of a few days, we recommend collecting fewer samples per day over more days.

Indexed as

AgedAgingArea Under CurveCircadian RhythmDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneLongitudinal StudiesMaleReproducibility of ResultsSalivaSpecimen HandlingTime FactorsYoung AdultHydrocortisoneGeneralizability theoryIndividual differencesLongitudinal designReliabilitySalivary cortisol

Identifiers

PMID25137484
PMCPMC4165809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.