Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25137251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Recombination blurs phylogenetic groups routine assignment in Escherichia coli: setting the record straight.

María-Carmen Turrientes, José-María González-Alba, Rosa del Campo, María-Rosario Baquero, Rafael Cantón, Fernando Baquero, Juan Carlos Galán

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trends in UropathogenicOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Gastrointestinal dysbiosis and Escherichia coli pathobionts in inflammatory bowel diseases.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Phylogeny, recombination, and invasiveness of group B Streptococcus revealed by genomic comparisons of its global strains.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Microcins inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  8. Characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phylogenetic analysis ofCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

María-Carmen TurrientesServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
José-María González-AlbaServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Rosa del CampoServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; Red Española para la Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas (REIPI), Madrid, Spain.
María-Rosario BaqueroUniversidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael CantónServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; Red Española para la Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas (REIPI), Madrid, Spain.
Fernando BaqueroServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Juan Carlos GalánServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESRed Espanola de Investigacion en Patologia Infecciosa · ESUniversidad Alfonso X el Sabio · ES

Funding

NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD002414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization of population structures plays a main role for understanding outbreaks and the dynamics of bacterial spreading. In Escherichia coli, the widely used combination of multiplex-PCR scheme together with goeBURST has some limitations. The purpose of this study is to show that the combination of different phylogenetic approaches based on concatenated sequences of MLST genes results in a more precise assignment of E. coli phylogenetic groups, complete understanding of population structure and reconstruction of ancestral clones. A collection of 80 Escherichia coli strains of different origins was analyzed following the Clermont and Doumith's multiplex-PCR schemes. Doumith's multiplex-PCR showed only 1.7% of misassignment, whereas Clermont's-2000 protocol reached 14.0%, although the discrepancies reached 30% and 38.7% respectively when recombinant C, F and E phylogroups were considered. Therefore, correct phylogroup attribution is highly variable and depends on the clonal composition of the sample. As far as population structure of these E. coli strains, including 48 E. coli genomes from GenBank, goeBURST provides a quite dispersed population structure; whereas NeighborNet approach reveals a complex population structure. MLST-based eBURST can infer different founder genotypes, for instance ST23/ST88 could be detected as the founder genotypes for STC23; however, phylogenetic reconstructions might suggest ST410 as the ancestor clone and several evolutionary trajectories with different founders. To improve our routine understanding of E. coli molecular epidemiology, we propose a strategy based on three successive steps; first, to discriminate three main groups A/B1/C, D/F/E and B2 following Doumith's protocol; second, visualization of population structure based on MLST genes according to goeBURST, using NeighborNet to establish more complex relationships among STs; and third, to perform, a cost-free characterization of evolutionary trajectories in variants emerging along the clonal expansion using parsimony methods of phylogenetic analysis.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticBayes TheoremEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularFounder EffectGenes, BacterialModels, GeneticMultilocus Sequence TypingMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID25137251
PMCPMC4138120
OpenAlexW2065626560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.