Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25137060›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genomic inverse PCR for exploration of ligated breakpoints (GIPFEL), a new method to detect translocations in leukemia.

Elisa Fueller, Daniel Schaefer, Ute Fischer, Pina F I Krell, Martin Stanulla, Arndt Borkhardt, Robert K Slany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modulation of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa FuellerDepartment of Genetics, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Daniel SchaeferDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, University Children's Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ute FischerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, University Children's Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Pina F I KrellDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, University Children's Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Martin StanullaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Arndt BorkhardtDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, University Children's Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Robert K SlanyDepartment of Genetics, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we present a novel method "Genomic inverse PCR for exploration of ligated breakpoints" (GIPFEL) that allows the sensitive detection of recurrent chromosomal translocations. This technique utilizes limited amounts of DNA as starting material and relies on PCR based quantification of unique DNA sequences that are created by circular ligation of restricted genomic DNA from translocation bearing cells. Because the complete potential breakpoint region is interrogated, a prior knowledge of the individual, specific interchromosomal fusion site is not required. We validated GIPFEL for the five most common gene fusions associated with childhood leukemia (MLL-AF4, MLL-AF9, MLL-ENL, ETV6-RUNX1, and TCF3-PBX1). A workflow of restriction digest, purification, ligation, removal of linear fragments and precipitation enriching for circular DNA was developed. GIPFEL allowed detection of translocation specific signature sequences down to a 10-4 dilution which is close to the theoretical limit. In a blinded proof-of-principle study utilizing DNA from cell lines and 144 children with B-precursor-ALL associated translocations this method was 100% specific with no false positive results. Sensitivity was 83%, 65%, and 24% for t(4;11), t(9;11) and t(11;19) respectively. Translocation t(12;21) was correctly detected in 64% and t(1;19) in 39% of the cases. In contrast to other methods, the characteristics of GIPFEL make it particularly attractive for prospective studies.

Indexed as

Chromosome BreakpointsTranslocation, GeneticChildChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 12Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitDNA, CircularETS Translocation Variant 6 ProteinHumansMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinOncogene Proteins, FusionPolymerase Chain ReactionCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitDNA, CircularETS Translocation Variant 6 ProteinMLL-AF4 fusion protein, humanMLL-AF9 fusion protein, humanMLL-ENL oncoprotein, humanMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinOncogene Proteins, FusionTCF3-PBX1 fusion protein, humanTEL-AML1 fusion protein

Identifiers

PMID25137060
PMCPMC4138100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.