ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2014
Progress in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension in children.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Right ventricular myocardial performance index (Tei) in premature infants.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023Article
- Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: Definitions, Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Comprehensive Physiology · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Pulmonary Hypertension in Pediatric Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and a Cardiology Evaluation: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2019Article
- Development and construct validation of a parent-proxy quality of life instrument in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia aged 4-8 years old.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Useful pharmacodynamic endpoints in children: selection, measurement, and next steps.Pediatric research · 2018Review
- A Computable Phenotype Improves Cohort Ascertainment in a Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Registry.The Journal of pediatrics · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPulmonary hypertension is a complex disease that extends beyond merely elevated pulmonary blood pressures and right ventricular dysfunction. Its multiple causes and ever-expanding diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches make it a heterogeneous disease with widely variable clinical sequelae. There are still many unanswered questions that challenge our understanding of this disease. RECENT
findingsThe study of pulmonary hypertension in the pediatric patient is as robust as ever, with the creation and inclusion of pediatric-specific disease characteristics in the most recent WHO classification system, improved understanding of the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in pediatric diseases such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and increasingly expanding diagnostic tools and management possibilities. Although the use of pulmonary hypertension therapies in children previously often relied on expert opinion and inferences from studies involving adults, pediatric-targeted research is becoming more widely supported and pursued, and has even come under recent debate, which at the very least stimulates further collaboration and discussion. SUMMARY: This review will highlight the changes in the pulmonary hypertension classification system, briefly explore pulmonary hypertension in bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and provide updates on the diagnostic and management tools used by experts in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.