Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25136861›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Ire1 mediated mRNA splicing in a C-terminus deletion mutant of Drosophila Xbp1.

Dina S Coelho, Catarina J Gaspar, Pedro M Domingos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Drosophila Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) Assays In Vitro and In Vivo.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dina S CoelhoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.
Catarina J GasparInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.
Pedro M DomingosInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.
Universidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Unfolded Protein Response is a homeostatic mechanism that permits eukaryotic cells to cope with Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress caused by excessive accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER lumen. The more conserved branch of the UPR relies on an ER transmembrane enzyme, Ire1, which, upon ER stress, promotes the unconventional splicing of a small intron from the mRNA encoding the transcription factor Xbp1. In mammals, two specific regions (the hydrophobic region 2--HR2--and the C-terminal translational pausing site) present in the Xbp1unspliced protein mediate the recruitment of the Xbp1 mRNA-ribosome-nascent chain complex to the ER membrane, so that Xbp1 mRNA can be spliced by Ire1. Here, we generated a Drosophila Xbp1 deletion mutant (Excision101) lacking both HR2 and C-terminal region, but not the Ire1 splicing site. We show that Ire1-dependent splicing of Xbp1 mRNA is reduced, but not abolished in Excision101. Our results suggest the existence of additional mechanisms for ER membrane targeting of Xbp1 mRNA that are independent of the C-terminal domain of Drosophila Xbp1unspliced.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum StressEndoribonucleasesRNA, MessengerRNA SplicingSequence DeletionTranscription FactorsUnfolded Protein ResponseDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsEndoribonucleasesinositol requiring enzyme-1, DrosophilaRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsXbp1 protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID25136861
PMCPMC4138184
OpenAlexW2069595544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.