Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25136729›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2013

Current progress in Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-Responsive materials for biomedical applications.

Sue Hyun Lee, Mukesh K Gupta, Jae Beum Bang, Hojae Bae, Hak-Joon Sung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sue Hyun LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Mukesh K Gupta
Jae Beum Bang
Hojae Bae
Hak-Joon Sung

Funding

Neurovascular Unit on a Chip: Chemical Communication, Drug and Toxin ResponsesUH2TR000491 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JANIGRO, DAMIR, NISWENDER, KEVIN D · 2012 to 2013
$2.2M
Optimizing Bioactive Hydrogels to Control Angiogenesis and Inflammation in FunctiR21HL091465 · NHLBI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI KOHN, JOACHIM B. · 2009 to 2010
$425k
NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR000491NHLBI NIH HHS HL091465NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL091465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, significant progress has been made in developing “stimuli-sensitive” biomaterials as a new therapeutic approach to interact with dynamic physiological conditions. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production has been implicated in important pathophysiological events, such as atherosclerosis,aging, and cancer. ROS are often overproduced locally in diseased cells and tissues, and they individually and synchronously contribute to many of the abnormalities associated with local pathogenesis. Therefore, the advantages of developing ROS-responsive materials extend beyond site-specific targeting of therapeutic delivery, and potentially include navigating,sensing, and repairing the cellular damages via programmed changes in material properties. Here we review the mechanism and development of biomaterials with ROS-induced solubility switch or degradation, as well as their performance and potential for future biomedical applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSolubilityBiocompatible MaterialsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID25136729
PMCPMC4146500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.