Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25136443›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2014

MaxBin: an automated binning method to recover individual genomes from metagenomes using an expectation-maximization algorithm.

Yu-Wei Wu, Yung-Hsu Tang, Susannah G Tringe, Blake A Simmons, Steven W Singer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 395 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
395citing papers in PubMed
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

395 citing papers in PubMed, 742 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

335 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Wei WuJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA ; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Yung-Hsu TangJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA ; City College of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94112, USA.
Susannah G TringeJoint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA ; Genomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Blake A SimmonsJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA ; Biological and Materials Sciences Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551, USA.
Steven W SingerJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA ; Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
City College of San Francisco · USJoint BioEnergy Institute · USJoint Genome Institute · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USSandia National Laboratories California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecovering individual genomes from metagenomic datasets allows access to uncultivated microbial populations that may have important roles in natural and engineered ecosystems. Understanding the roles of these uncultivated populations has broad application in ecology, evolution, biotechnology and medicine. Accurate binning of assembled metagenomic sequences is an essential step in recovering the genomes and understanding microbial functions.

resultsWe have developed a binning algorithm, MaxBin, which automates the binning of assembled metagenomic scaffolds using an expectation-maximization algorithm after the assembly of metagenomic sequencing reads. Binning of simulated metagenomic datasets demonstrated that MaxBin had high levels of accuracy in binning microbial genomes. MaxBin was used to recover genomes from metagenomic data obtained through the Human Microbiome Project, which demonstrated its ability to recover genomes from real metagenomic datasets with variable sequencing coverages. Application of MaxBin to metagenomes obtained from microbial consortia adapted to grow on cellulose allowed genomic analysis of new, uncultivated, cellulolytic bacterial populations, including an abundant myxobacterial population distantly related to Sorangium cellulosum that possessed a much smaller genome (5 MB versus 13 to 14 MB) but has a more extensive set of genes for biomass deconstruction. For the cellulolytic consortia, the MaxBin results were compared to binning using emergent self-organizing maps (ESOMs) and differential coverage binning, demonstrating that it performed comparably to these methods but had distinct advantages in automation, resolution of related genomes and sensitivity.

conclusionsThe automatic binning software that we developed successfully classifies assembled sequences in metagenomic datasets into recovered individual genomes. The isolation of dozens of species in cellulolytic microbial consortia, including a novel species of myxobacteria that has the smallest genome among all sequenced aerobic myxobacteria, was easily achieved using the binning software. This work demonstrates that the processes required for recovering genomes from assembled metagenomic datasets can be readily automated, an important advance in understanding the metabolic potential of microbes in natural environments. MaxBin is available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/maxbin/.

Indexed as

BinningExpectation-maximization algorithmMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID25136443
PMCPMC4129434
OpenAlexW2121291798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.