Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25136267›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2014

Quantifying the Sources of Kinetic Frustration in Folding Simulations of Small Proteins.

Andrej J Savol, Chakra S Chennubhotla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Approximating frustration scores in complex networks via perturbed Laplacian spectra.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrej J SavolDept. of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States ; Joint Carnegie Mellon University-University of Pittsburgh PhD Program in Computational Biology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States.
Chakra S ChennubhotlaDept. of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States.

Funding

Integrated Interdisciplinary, inter-university PhD Program Computational Biology (T32)T32EB009403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, BAR-JOSEPH, ZIV · 2009 to 2023
$4.4M
Conformational sub-states in enzyme catalysis: Applications to ribonucleaseR01GM105978 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AGARWAL, PRATUL K, DOUCET, NICOLAS · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
Continued Development of Protein Dynamics Software ProDyR01GM099738 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099738NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments and atomistic simulations of polypeptides have revealed structural intermediates that promote or inhibit conformational transitions to the native state during folding. We invoke a concept of "kinetic frustration" to quantify the prevalence and impact of these behaviors on folding rates within a large set of atomistic simulation data for 10 fast-folding proteins, where each protein's conformational space is represented as a Markov state model of conformational transitions. Our graph theoretic approach addresses what conformational features correlate with folding inhibition and therefore permits comparison among features within a single protein network and also more generally between proteins. Nonnative contacts and nonnative secondary structure formation can thus be quantitatively implicated in inhibiting folding for several of the tested peptides.

Identifiers

PMID25136267
PMCPMC4132847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.