Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25136045›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2014

Pharmacokinetics of fluoride in toddlers after application of 5% sodium fluoride dental varnish.

Peter Milgrom, Donald M Taves, Amy S Kim, Gene E Watson, Jeremy A Horst

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01754831 (Fluoride Administered and Retained After Topical Fluoride Varnish), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01754831 early_phase1completednot on this map

Fluoride Administered and Retained After Topical Fluoride Varnish

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2011 to 2013Enrolled6ConditionsHealthyArmsFluoride varnish
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Comparative Evaluation of Anticariogenic Efficacy ofInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter MilgromDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; dfrc@uw.edu.
Donald M TavesDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;
Amy S KimDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;
Gene E WatsonDepartment of Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; and.
Jeremy A HorstDepartment of Orofacial Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
University of Washington · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Statistics and Data Coordinating CenterU54DE019346 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MANCL, LLOYD A · 2008 to 2012
$6.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS 1U54DE019346NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE019346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay) among preschool children is increasing, driven partially by an earlier age of onset of carious lesions. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends application of 5% sodium fluoride varnish at intervals increasing with caries risk status, as soon as teeth are present. However, the varnishes are marketed for treatment of tooth sensitivity and are regulated as medical devices rather than approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for prevention of dental caries (tooth decay). The objective of this research is to examine the safety of use in toddlers by characterizing the absorption and distribution profile of a currently marketed fluoride varnish. We measured urinary fluoride for 5 hours after application of fluoride varnish to teeth in 6 toddlers aged 12 to 15 months. Baseline levels were measured on a separate day. The urine was extracted from disposable diapers, measured by rapid diffusion, and extrapolated to plasma levels. The mean estimated plasma fluoride concentration was 13 μg/L (SD, 9 μg/L) during the baseline visit and 21 μg/L (SD, 8 μg/L) during the 5 hours after treatment. Mean estimated peak plasma fluoride after treatment was 57 μg/L (SD, 22 μg/L), and 20 μg/kg (SD, 4 μg/L) was retained on average. Retained fluoride was 253 times lower than the acute toxic dose of 5 mg/kg. Mean plasma fluoride after placement of varnish was within an SD of control levels. Occasional application of fluoride varnish following American Academy of Pediatrics guidance is safe for toddlers.

Indexed as

Dental Cavity LiningDental CariesHumansInfantSodium FluorideSodium Fluoridedrug safetyfluoridesfluoride varnishespharmacokineticstoddler

Identifiers

PMID25136045
PMCPMC4143996
OpenAlexW2052738037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.