Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25135980›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

The role of epigenetic-related codes in neurocomputation: dynamic hardware in the brain.

Lawrence Edelstein, John Smythies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Synaptic Spinules in the Olfactory Circuit ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Exosomes in stroke pathogenesis and therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2016
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Introduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lawrence EdelsteinMedimark Corporation, PO Box 2316, Del Mar, CA 92014, USA larry.edelstein@medimark.com.
John SmythiesIntegrative Neuroscience Program, Center for Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA Department of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a review of recent work on the role that two epigenetic-related systems may play in information processing mechanisms in the brain. The first consists of exosomes that transport epigenetic-related molecules between neurons. The second consists of homeoproteins like Otx2 that carry information from sense organs to primary sensory cortex. There is developing evidence that presynaptic neurons may be able to modulate the fine microanatomical structure in the postsynaptic neuron. This may be conducted by three mechanisms, of which the first is well established and the latter two are novel. (i) By the well-established activation of receptors that trigger a chain of signalling molecules (second messengers) that result in the upregulation and/or activation of a transcription factor. The two novel systems are the exosome system and homeoproteins. (ii) Exosomes are small vesicles that are released upon activation of the axon terminal, traverse the synaptic cleft, probably via astrocytes and are taken up by the postsynaptic neuron. They carry a load of signalling proteins and a variety of forms of RNA. These loads may then be transported widely throughout the postsynaptic neuron and engineer modulations in the fine structure of computational machinery by epigenetic-related processes. (iii) Otx2 is a transcription factor that, inter alia, controls the development and survival of PV+ GABAergic interneurons (PV cells) in the primary visual cortex. It is synthesized in the retina and is transported to the cortex by a presently unknown mechanism that probably includes direct cell-to-cell transfer, and may, or may not, include transfer by the dynein and exosome systems in addition. These three mechanisms explain a quantity of data from the field of de- and reafferentation plasticity. These data show that the modality of the presynaptic neuron controls to a large extent the modality of the postsynaptic neuron. However, the mechanism that effects this is currently unknown. The exosome and the homeoprotein hypotheses provide novel explanations to add to the well-established earlier mechanism described above.

Indexed as

BrainCell CommunicationEpigenesis, GeneticExosomesHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMental ProcessesMicroRNAsNeurologyNeuronsOtx Transcription FactorsSecond Messenger SystemsSynapsesHomeodomain ProteinsMicroRNAsOTX2 protein, humanOtx Transcription FactorsepigeneticsexosomesmicroRNAsneural modalityneurocomputationsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID25135980
PMCPMC4142040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.