Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25135965›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

The RNA-centred view of the synapse: non-coding RNAs and synaptic plasticity.

Neil R Smalheiser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. RNA in axons, dendrites, synapses and beyond.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Differential and unique patterns of synaptic miRNA expression in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of depressed subjects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Epigenetics of the Synapse in Neurodegeneration.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Neil R SmalheiserDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA neils@uic.edu.

Funding

Validating microRNA Analysis in Human Postmortem BrainR21MH081099 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI DWIVEDI, YOGESH · 2007 to 2008
$384k
RNAi-Mediated Gene Suppression in Adult Mammalian CNSR21DA015450 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SMALHEISER, NEIL R · 2002 to 2003
$312k
NCRR NIH HHS P41RR0045050NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA015450NIDA NIH HHS R21DA015450NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH081099NIMH NIH HHS R21MH081099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If mRNAs were the only RNAs made by a neuron, there would be a simple mapping of mRNAs to proteins. However, microRNAs and other non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs; endo-siRNAs, piRNAs, BC1, BC200, antisense and long ncRNAs, repeat-related transcripts, etc.) regulate mRNAs via effects on protein translation as well as transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms. Not only are genes ON or OFF, but their ability to be translated can be turned ON or OFF at the level of synapses, supporting an enormous increase in information capacity. Here, I review evidence that ncRNAs are expressed pervasively within dendrites in mammalian brain; that some are activity-dependent and highly enriched near synapses; and that synaptic ncRNAs participate in plasticity responses including learning and memory. Ultimately, ncRNAs can be viewed as the post-it notes of the neuron. They have no literal meaning of their own, but derive their functions from where (and to what) they are stuck. This may explain, in part, why ncRNAs differ so dramatically from protein-coding genes, both in terms of the usual indicators of functionality and in terms of evolutionary constraints. ncRNAs do not appear to be direct mediators of synaptic transmission in the manner of neurotransmitters or receptors, yet they orchestrate synaptic plasticity-and may drive species-specific changes in cognition.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognitionDendritesGene Expression RegulationHumansLearningMicroRNAsNeuronal PlasticityRNA, UntranslatedSpecies SpecificitySynapsesMicroRNAsRNA, UntranslatedmicroRNAsnon-coding RNAssynaptic plasticitytransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID25135965
PMCPMC4142025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.