Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25135593›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of haematology2015

Switching treatments in haemophilia: is there a risk of inhibitor development?

Elena Santagostino, Günter Auerswald, Gary Benson, Gerry Dolan, Victor Jiménez-Yuste, Thierry Lambert, Rolf Ljung, Massimo Morfini, Eduardo Remor, Silva Zupančić Šalek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of haematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elena SantagostinoAngelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, IRCCS Cà Granda Foundation, Maggiore Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Günter Auerswald
Gary Benson
Gerry Dolan
Victor Jiménez-Yuste
Thierry Lambert
Rolf Ljung
Massimo Morfini
Eduardo Remor
Silva Zupančić Šalek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with haemophilia A (and their physicians) may be reluctant to switch factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, often due to concerns about increasing the risk of inhibitors; this reluctance to switch may contribute to patients missing the clinical benefits provided by the arrival of new factor VIII products. This topic was explored at the Eleventh Zürich Haemophilia Forum. Clinical scenarios for which product switching may be cause for concern were discussed; when there is a clinical need, there are no absolute contraindications to switching, but some patients (e.g. previously untreated patients and those undergoing elective surgery) may require more careful consideration. Both patient and physician surveys indicate that the reluctance to switch, and the fear of inhibitor development, does not appear to be evidence based. The evaluation of more recent data did not support previous studies suggesting that particular products (e.g. recombinant vs. plasma-derived and full length vs. B-domain modified) may be associated with increased risk. In addition, data from three national product switches showed that switching was not associated with increased inhibitor risk, but highlighted the need for regular inhibitor testing and for a centralised, unbiased database of inhibitor incidence. To conclude, current evidence does not suggest that switching products significantly influences inhibitor development.

Indexed as

Drug SubstitutionFactor VIIIHemophilia AHumansIsoantibodiesRecombinant ProteinsRiskFactor VIIIIsoantibodiesRecombinant Proteinshaemophiliainhibitorsproduct switching

Identifiers

PMID25135593
PMCPMC4407931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.