SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Identification of microRNAs as novel biomarkers for detecting esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Asians: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Circulating microRNAs as novel potential diagnostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of epigenetic biomarkers in progression from non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Latest insights into the global epidemiological features, screening, early diagnosis and prognosis prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Role of salivary miRNAs in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders: a mini-review of available evidence.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Circulating plasma microRNAs in the detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Screening for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: recent advances.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2018Review
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Circulating MicroRNAs for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- A retrospective study on the prognostic value of preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with primary small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus.OncoTargets and therapy · 2017Article
- From blood to breath: New horizons for esophageal cancer biomarkers.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Article
- Non-coding RNAs in saliva: emerging biomarkers for molecular diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Salivary extracellular noncoding RNA: emerging biomarkers for molecular diagnostics.Clinical therapeutics · 2015Review
- Combined downregulation of microRNA-133a and microRNA-133b predicts chemosensitivity of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence has suggested that microRNAs (miRNAs) may play potential role as ideal diagnostic indicators of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, previous studies have met discrepant results. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the potential diagnostic value of miRNAs for ESCC. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and other databases. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the overall test performance. The Q statistic and the I(2) test were used to assess between-study heterogeneity. The potential sources of heterogeneity were further analyzed by subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Seventeen studies from eight articles, including 995 ESCC patients and 733 healthy controls, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled SEN and SPE were 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.85) and 0.83 (95 % CI 0.76-0.88), respectively. The pooled PLR was 4.6 (95% CI 3.3-6.5), NLR was 0.23 (95% CI 0.19-0.29), and DOR was 20 (95% CI 13-31). The pooled AUC was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93). Subgroup analyses indicated that blood-based miRNA assay displays better diagnostic accuracy than saliva-based miRNA assay. In summary, miRNA analysis may serve as novel noninvasive biomarkers for ESCC with excellent diagnostic characteristic. In addition, subgroup analysis suggested that blood-based assay yields better diagnostic characteristics than saliva-based assay. However, many issues should be managed before these findings can be translated into a clinically useful detection method for ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.