ArticleCardiology and therapy2013
Cardiac sarcoidosis: case report, workup, and review of the literature.
Article in Cardiology and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-Life Utilization of Criteria Guidelines for Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, with coronary heart disease being the most common manifestation disease. While deaths attributed to coronary heart disease are falling in the developed world, the number of patients with cardiomyopathy continues to increase. In this paper, the current literature on imaging modalities for infiltrative and inflammatory cardiomyopathies is reviewed, focusing on the three most common diagnoses, namely sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, and myocarditis. CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old male presented with palpitations and left ventricular systolic dysfunction for a second opinion following an initial nondiagnostic workup. The employed clinical and radiologic approach that led to a definitive diagnosis and disease-specific treatment is presented here.
conclusionThe current algorithms and the strengths and weaknesses of the various radiologic techniques in establishing a diagnosis in patients who present with new onset cardiomyopathy are reviewed. Recommendations are provided regarding the selection between echocardiography, computed tomography radionuclide imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing the various causes of cardiomyopathy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.