Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25135345›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2014

Advances in primary angiitis of the central nervous system.

Michael Lucke, Rula A Hajj-Ali

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Closer Look at Angiitis of the central nervous system.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael LuckeCleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA, luckem@ccf.org.
Rula A Hajj-Ali
Case Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) is a rare idiopathic inflammatory syndrome targeting the vessels of the brain and spinal cord. Clinical presentation is variable, insidious, and non-specific; headache and encephalopathy are the most common symptoms. Multiple strokes affecting numerous vascular territories may be seen, and both focal and diffuse neurologic dysfunction may be present. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is crucial; a normal CSF along with normal brain parenchymal imaging carries a high negative predictive value in excluding PACNS. The role of imaging continues to evolve, and most patients have abnormal vascular imaging; however, the specificity of imaging for PACNS has historically been poor. Cerebral and meningeal biopsy is a valuable tool in confirming the diagnosis and excluding mimics. PACNS generally responds to immunosuppressive therapy. Failure to respond should prompt evaluation for an alternative diagnosis. Given the rarity of this disorder, exclusion of mimics such as the reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes (RCVS) and infectious processes is essential.

Indexed as

Constriction, PathologicDiagnosis, DifferentialGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisVasculitis, Central Nervous SystemVasospasm, IntracranialGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25135345
OpenAlexW2013226480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.