Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25135167›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2014

A double-pulse approach for electrotransfection.

L Pasquet, E Bellard, M Golzio, M P Rols, J Teissie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L PasquetCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, BP64182, 205 route de Narbonne, 31077, Toulouse, France.
E Bellard
M Golzio
M P Rols
J Teissie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene transfer and expression can be obtained by delivering calibrated electric pulses on cells in the presence of plasmids coding for the activity of interest. The electric treatment affects the plasma membrane and induces the formation of a transient complex between nucleic acids and the plasma membrane. It results in a delivery of the plasmid in the cytoplasm. Expression is only obtained if the plasmid is translocated inside the nucleus. This is a key limit in the process. We previously showed that delivery of a high-field short-duration electric pulse was inducing a structural alteration of the nuclear envelope. This study investigates if the double-pulse approach (first pulse to transfer the plasmid to the cytoplasm, and second pulse to induce the structural alteration of the envelope) was a way to enhance the protein expression using the green fluorescent protein as a reporter. We observed that not only the double-pulse approach induced the transfection of a lower number of cells but moreover, these transfected cells were less fluorescent than the cells treated only with the first pulse.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCell MembraneCHO CellsCricetulusElectricityElectroporationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsNuclear EnvelopePlasmidsTransfectionGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.