Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25135081›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2014

A program to identify prognostic and predictive gene signatures.

Sam D Chorlton, Robin M Hallett, John A Hassell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam D Chorlton
Robin M Hallett
John A HassellDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Functional Genomics, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton L8N 3Z5, Ontario, Canada. hassell@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advent of high-throughput technologies to profile human tumors has generated unprecedented insight into our molecular understanding of cancer. However, analysis of such high dimensional data is challenging and requires significant expertise which is not routinely available to many cancer researchers.

resultsTo overcome this limitation, we developed a freely accessible and user friendly Program to Identify Molecular Signatures (PIMS). Importantly, such signatures allow important insight into cancer biology, as well as provide clinical tools to identify potential biomarkers that might provide means to accurately stratify patients into different risk or treatment groups. We evaluated the performance of PIMS by identifying and testing predictive and prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer, using multiple breast tumor microarray cohorts representing hundreds of patients. Importantly, PIMS identified signatures classified patients into high and low risk groups with at least similar performance to other commonly used gene signature selection techniques.

conclusionsOur program is contained entirely within a Microsoft Excel file and therefore requires no installation of any additional programs or training. Hence, PIMS provides an accessible tool for cancer researchers to identify predictive and prognostic gene signatures to advance their research.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPrognosisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25135081
PMCPMC4148546
OpenAlexW2056964632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.