Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25135037›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2013

Effects of a single session group intervention for pain management in chronic pain patients: a pilot study.

Ted Jones, Samantha Lookatch, Todd Moore

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ted JonesBehavioral Medicine Institute, Pain Consultants of East Tennessee, 1128 E. Weisgarber Road, Suite 100, Knoxville, TN, 37909, USA, tjones@painconsultants.com.
Samantha Lookatch
Todd Moore

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBehavioral and psychological interventions are key components of treating chronic pain. However, there are logistical barriers to providing such treatments, including a lack of psychological staff to provide such interventions and limited ability of patients with chronic pain to attend multiple sessions. As other areas of mental health have shown promise in providing single session interventions for various conditions, this pilot study hypothesized that a single group session for chronic pain patients could be helpful in decreasing patient pain catastrophizing. The five content areas addressed in the group were termed understanding, accepting, calming, balancing, and coping.

methodsA pilot study was undertaken. Chronic pain patients were given a pre-group assessment, including the Pain Catastrophizing Scale with a follow-up assessment administered 3 months later.

resultsFifty-three patients were studied. Results showed a significant decrease in overall pain catastrophizing scores at follow-up. A clear majority of patients also reported that the group was helpful and should be offered to other pain patients.

conclusionThis study suggests that a single session group can be a helpful intervention for patients with chronic pain.

Identifiers

PMID25135037
PMCPMC4107875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.