Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25134100›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014

Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.

S U Dombrowski, K Knittle, A Avenell, V Araújo-Soares, F F Sniehotta

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 374 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
374citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
50.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03127696 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised Placebo-controlled Study of Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) to Impact Body Weight and Glycemic Control in Obese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2017 to 2019Enrolled61ConditionsType2 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, ObeseArmsFecal Microbiota Transplantation, Lifestyle Modification Program, Sham
NCT05927337 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Managing Obesity in People With Chronic Kidney Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsChronic Kidney Diseases, Obesity, OverweightArmsCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for managing Obesity
NCT07082608 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Weight Loss From Endoscopic Sleeve Gastropathy (ESG) Plus Life Style Modification VS Life Style Modification Alone on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Patients With Obesity - Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaRan2025 to 2029Enrolled74ConditionsOSA - Obstructive Sleep ApneaArmsEndoscopic Sleeve Gastropathy, Lifestyle Modification alone
NCT07262593 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Family-Based Meal Timing for Cancer Prevention Among Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders: FAMTIME

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2024 to 2024Enrolled2ConditionsCancer PreventionArmsTime Restricted Eating (TRE), Medically Tailored Meals (MTM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

374 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 810 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric outcomes in patients with obesity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Third-wave cognitive behaviour therapies for weight management: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2020
    Pooled it
  20. Trial

314 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S U DombrowskiInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Cottrell Building, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
K KnittleInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK MoveLab - Physical Activity and Exercise Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
A AvenellHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
V Araújo-SoaresInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
F F SniehottaInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK falko.sniehotta@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKChief Scientist Office HSRU1Medical Research Council MR/J000477/1Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review and describe currently available approaches to supporting maintenance of weight loss in obese adults and to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions.

designSystematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified through to January 2014. Randomised trials of interventions to maintain weight loss provided to initially obese adults (aged ≥ 18) after weight loss of ≥ 5% body weight with long term (≥ 12 months) follow-up of weight change (main outcome) were included. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Potential studies were screened independently and in duplicate; study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the effects of interventions on weight loss maintenance with the inverse variance method and a random effects model. Results are presented as mean differences in weight change, with 95% confidence intervals.

results45 trials involving 7788 individuals were included. Behavioural interventions focusing on both food intake and physical activity resulted in an average difference of -1.56 kg (95% confidence interval -2.27 to -0.86 kg; 25 comparisons, 2949 participants) in weight regain compared with controls at 12 months. Orlistat combined with behavioural interventions resulted in a -1.80 kg (-2.54 to -1.06; eight comparisons, 1738 participants) difference compared with placebo at 12 months. All orlistat studies reported higher frequencies of adverse gastrointestinal events in the experimental compared with placebo control groups. A dose-response relation for orlistat treatment was found, with 120 mg doses three times a day leading to greater weight loss maintenance (-2.34 kg, -3.03 to -1.65) compared with 60 mg and 30 mg three times a day (-0.70 kg, 95% confidence interval -1.92 to 0.52), P=0.02.

conclusionsBehavioural interventions that deal with both diet and physical activity show small but significant benefits on weight loss maintenance.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyDiet, ReducingExerciseHealth BehaviorWeight LossBody WeightHumansObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25134100
PMCPMC4020585
OpenAlexW2063601306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.