Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25133774›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genome-wide characterization of insertion and deletion variation in chicken using next generation sequencing.

Yiyuan Yan, Guoqiang Yi, Congjiao Sun, Lujiang Qu, Ning Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. InvestigatingArchives animal breeding · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel 61-bp Indel ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Novel 65-bp Indel in theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiyuan YanDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Guoqiang YiDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Congjiao SunDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Lujiang QuDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Ning YangDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion and deletion (INDEL) is one of the main events contributing to genetic and phenotypic diversity, which receives less attention than SNP and large structural variation. To gain a better knowledge of INDEL variation in chicken genome, we applied next generation sequencing on 12 diverse chicken breeds at an average effective depth of 8.6. Over 1.3 million non-redundant short INDELs (1-49 bp) were obtained, the vast majority (92.48%) of which were novel. Follow-up validation assays confirmed that most (88.00%) of the randomly selected INDELs represent true variations. The majority (95.76%) of INDELs were less than 10 bp. Both the detected number and affected bases were larger for deletions than insertions. In total, INDELs covered 3.8 Mbp, corresponding to 0.36% of the chicken genome. The average genomic INDEL density was estimated as 0.49 per kb. INDELs were ubiquitous and distributed in a non-uniform fashion across chromosomes, with lower INDEL density in micro-chromosomes than in others, and some functional regions like exons and UTRs were prone to less INDELs than introns and intergenic regions. Nearly 620,253 INDELs fell in genic regions, 1,765 (0.28%) of which located in exons, spanning 1,358 (7.56%) unique Ensembl genes. Many of them are associated with economically important traits and some are the homologues of human disease-related genes. We demonstrate that sequencing multiple individuals at a medium depth offers a promising way for reliable identification of INDELs. The coding INDELs are valuable candidates for further elucidation of the association between genotypes and phenotypes. The chicken INDELs revealed by our study can be useful for future studies, including development of INDEL markers, construction of high density linkage map, INDEL arrays design, and hopefully, molecular breeding programs in chicken.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvian ProteinsChickensChromosome MappingDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGene OntologyGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingINDEL MutationMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAvian Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25133774
PMCPMC4136736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.